These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2620572)

  • 61. Microsurgery in infertility.
    Gomel V
    Int J Fertil; 1978; 23(4):244-5. PubMed ID: 33908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Microsurgical repair of the fallopian tubes.
    O'Brien BM; Sully L; Jolly HF; Morrison WA
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Apr; 53(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 6576766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Postoperative hysterosalpingography. Radiographic appearances and clinical results following tubal surgery.
    Young GP; Ott DJ; Chen MY; Fayez JA; Gelfand DW
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Dec; 38(12):924-8. PubMed ID: 8120848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Microsurgery for tubal reconstruction following Falope-Ring sterilization in swine.
    Rock JA; Rosenwaks Z; Adashi EY; Jones HW; King TM
    J Microsurg; 1979; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 16317930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Factors influencing the outcome of microsurgical tubal ligation reversals.
    Seiler JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 6859139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Microsurgical reconstruction of fallopian tubes].
    Vera E; Brandt A; Glavic A; Chiong A
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1993; 58(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 7991846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Microsurgical tubal desterilization: an efficient procedure. Evaluation of a 42 cases cohort according to Guzick's biparametric method].
    Hoffmann P; Racinet C; Bringer S; Desmons F; Ayoubi JM
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Jan; 38(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20022277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Microsurgical reconstruction of the fallopian tubes. Experience with 24 cases].
    Izzo VM; Srougi M; Salvatore CA
    AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras; 1984; 30(1-2):29-31. PubMed ID: 6610893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Tubal anastomosis after previous sterilization: a systematic review.
    van Seeters JAH; Chua SJ; Mol BWJ; Koks CAM
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 May; 23(3):358-370. PubMed ID: 28333337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Sterilization reversal: fertility results.
    Dubuisson JB; Chapron C; Nos C; Morice P; Aubriot FX; Garnier P
    Hum Reprod; 1995 May; 10(5):1145-51. PubMed ID: 7657755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Cha SH; Lee MH; Kim JH; Lee CN; Yoon TK; Cha KY
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2001 Aug; 8(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 11509772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.
    Yoon TK; Sung HR; Cha SH; Lee CN; Cha KY
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Jan; 67(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8986677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Fertility outcome analysis after modified laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis.
    Ai J; Zhang P; Jin L; Li Y; Yue J; Ma D; Zhang H
    Front Med; 2011 Sep; 5(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 21964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Fallopian tube anastomosis procedures to restore fertility.
    Haspel-Siegel AS
    AORN J; 1997 Jan; 65(1):75-82, 85-6. PubMed ID: 9012876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Reversal of tubal sterilization.
    Med J Aust; 1980 Jun; 1(12):570-1. PubMed ID: 7402150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube.
    Levinson CJ; Simon T
    Compr Ther; 1979 Sep; 5(9):61-8. PubMed ID: 158481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility.
    Bissonnette F; Lapensée L; Bouzayen R
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):549-52. PubMed ID: 10519634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Tubal anastomosis using a tissue adhesive.
    Rücker K; Baumann R; Volk M; Taubert HD
    Hum Reprod; 1988 Feb; 3(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 3356773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Pregnancy rates following tubal anastomosis: Pomeroy partial salpingectomy versus electrocautery.
    Putman JM; Holden AE; Olive DL
    J Gynecol Surg; 1990; 6(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 10149761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Is microsurgical preserving operation of tubal pregnancy sensible?].
    Pelzer V; Severing K; Schlösser HW
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Jun; 50(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 2376306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.