164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26205897)
41. Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation.
Eck JC; Walker MP; Currier BL; Chen Q; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 17912127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Biomechanical analysis of locked and non-locked plate fixation of the clavicle.
Little KJ; Riches PE; Fazzi UG
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):921-5. PubMed ID: 22405337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of pullout strength between 3.5-mm fully threaded, bicortical screws and 4.0-mm partially threaded, cancellous screws in the fixation of medial malleolar fractures.
Pollard JD; Deyhim A; Rigby RB; Dau N; King C; Fallat LM; Bir C
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 20362467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws.
Cyr SJ; Currier BL; Eck JC; Foy A; Chen Q; Larson DR; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):661-5. PubMed ID: 17526435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Constructs for Metacarpal Spiral Fracture Fixation in a Cadaver Model: 2 Large Screws Versus 3 Small Screws.
Eu-Jin Cheah A; Behn AW; Comer G; Yao J
J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Dec; 42(12):1033.e1-1033.e6. PubMed ID: 28888569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lag screw fixation of medial malleolar fractures: a biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical comparison of unicortical partially threaded lag screws and bicortical fully threaded lag screws.
Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Borrelli J
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Oct; 26(10):602-6. PubMed ID: 22437423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. In vitro comparison of lagged and nonlagged screw fixation of metacarpal fractures in cadavers.
Nicklin S; Ingram S; Gianoutsos MP; Walsh WR
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1732-6. PubMed ID: 19084171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mechanical comparison of novel bioabsorbable plates with titanium plates and small-series clinical comparisons for metacarpal fractures.
Sakai A; Oshige T; Zenke Y; Menuki K; Murai T; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):1597-604. PubMed ID: 22992850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Unicortical Fixation is Sufficient for Surgical Treatment of Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fractures in Children.
Arkader A; Schur M; Refakis C; Capraro A; Woon R; Choi P
J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Jan; 39(1):e18-e22. PubMed ID: 30376496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of the fixation ability of headless compression screws and locking plate for metacarpal shaft transverse fracture.
Chiu YC; Hsu CE; Ho TY; Ting YN; Wei BH; Tsai MT; Hsu JT
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(39):e27375. PubMed ID: 34596154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Higher stability with locking plates in hand surgery? Biomechanical investigation of the TriLock system in a fracture model.
Doht S; Jansen H; Meffert R; Frey S
Int Orthop; 2012 Aug; 36(8):1641-6. PubMed ID: 22426933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Mechanical Comparative Analysis.
Jones CM; Padegimas EM; Weikert N; Greulich S; Ilyas AM; Siegler S
Hand (N Y); 2019 Mar; 14(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 28933187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Lopez MJ; Wilson DG; Trostle SS; Markel MD
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 11340556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An in vitro biomechanical comparison between prototype tapered shaft cortical bone screws and AO cortical bone screws for an equine metacarpal dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(7):634-42. PubMed ID: 17026548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Occipital screw pullout strength. A biomechanical investigation of occipital morphology.
Haher TR; Yeung AW; Caruso SA; Merola AA; Shin T; Zipnick RI; Gorup JM; Bono C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 9921584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Conventional bicortical pin substitution with a novel unicortical pin in external fixation: A biomechanical study.
Park KH; Park HW; Oh CW; Lee JH; Kim JW; Oh JK; Park IH; Ha SS
Injury; 2021 Jul; 52(7):1673-1678. PubMed ID: 33906742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?
Freeman AL; Tornetta P; Schmidt A; Bechtold J; Ricci W; Fleming M
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20182252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biomechanical comparison of pull-out force of unicortical versus bicortical screws in proximal phalanges of the hand: a human cadaveric study.
Khalid M; Theivendran K; Cheema M; Rajaratnam V; Deshmukh SC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1136-40. PubMed ID: 18649977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
