BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26206170)

  • 1. Unfreezing cognitions during an intractable conflict: Does an external incentive for negotiating peace and (low levels of) collective angst increase information seeking?
    Wohl MJ; Porat R; Halperin E
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 55(1):65-87. PubMed ID: 26206170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The enemy's gaze: Immersive virtual environments enhance peace promoting attitudes and emotions in violent intergroup conflicts.
    Hasson Y; Schori-Eyal N; Landau D; Hasler BS; Levy J; Friedman D; Halperin E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222342. PubMed ID: 31509584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup.
    Wohl MJ; Branscombe NR; Reysen S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):898-910. PubMed ID: 20519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat.
    Porat R; Tamir M; Wohl MJA; Gur T; Halperin E
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):480-491. PubMed ID: 29667484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overcoming the barrier of narrative adherence in conflicts through awareness of the psychological bias of naïve realism.
    Nasie M; Bar-Tal D; Pliskin R; Nahhas E; Halperin E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 25246039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remembering historical victimization: collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions.
    Wohl MJ; Branscombe NR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Jun; 94(6):988-1006. PubMed ID: 18505313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Informative Process Model as a New Intervention for Attitude Change in Intractable Conflicts: Theory and Empirical Evidence.
    Rosler N; Sharvit K; Hameiri B; Wiener-Blotner O; Idan O; Bar-Tal D
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():946410. PubMed ID: 35959078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of a changing world induce hope and promote peace in intractable conflicts.
    Cohen-Chen S; Crisp RJ; Halperin E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Apr; 41(4):498-512. PubMed ID: 25713171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability.
    Halperin E; Russell AG; Trzesniewski KH; Gross JJ; Dweck CS
    Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6050):1767-9. PubMed ID: 21868627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotions in conflicts: understanding emotional processes sheds light on the nature and potential resolution of intractable conflicts.
    Halperin E; Tagar MR
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2017 Oct; 17():94-98. PubMed ID: 28950981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field.
    Halperin E; Porat R; Tamir M; Gross JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jan; 24(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 23211565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Israeli and Palestinian families in the peace process: sources of stress and response patterns.
    Lavee Y; Ben-David A; Azaiza F
    Fam Process; 1997 Sep; 36(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 9439937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dehumanization, retributive and restorative justice, and aggressive versus diplomatic intergroup conflict resolution strategies.
    Leidner B; Castano E; Ginges J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Feb; 39(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 23386655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paradoxical Thinking as a Conflict-Resolution Intervention: Comparison to Alternative Interventions and Examination of Psychological Mechanisms.
    Hameiri B; Nabet E; Bar-Tal D; Halperin E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Jan; 44(1):122-139. PubMed ID: 29052459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution.
    Porat R; Halperin E; Tamir M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Feb; 110(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 26785061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes: insights from attitude theory.
    Kelman HC
    Am Psychol; 2007; 62(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 17516774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Whole Other Story: Inclusive Victimhood Narratives Reduce Competitive Victimhood and Intergroup Hostility.
    Adelman L; Leidner B; Ünal H; Nahhas E; Shnabel N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1416-30. PubMed ID: 27624085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the impact and durability of a group malleability intervention in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    Goldenberg A; Cohen-Chen S; Goyer JP; Dweck CS; Gross JJ; Halperin E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 29311299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Palestinian youth of the Intifada: PTSD and future orientation.
    Lavi T; Solomon Z
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2005 Nov; 44(11):1176-83. PubMed ID: 16239867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.
    Halevy N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1687-702. PubMed ID: 18832517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.