These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26206926)

  • 1. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Ginther DK; Kahn S
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. WOMEN IN SCIENCE. Response to Comment on "Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines".
    Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6246):391. PubMed ID: 26206927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social Science. Gender inequality in science.
    Penner AM
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6219):234-5. PubMed ID: 25593174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.
    Leslie SJ; Cimpian A; Meyer M; Freeland E
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6219):262-5. PubMed ID: 25593183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Frequency of "Brilliant" and "Genius" in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields.
    Storage D; Horne Z; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150194. PubMed ID: 26938242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance.
    Meyer M; Cimpian A; Leslie SJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():235. PubMed ID: 25814964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Future of Women in Psychological Science.
    Gruber J; Mendle J; Lindquist KA; Schmader T; Clark LA; Bliss-Moreau E; Akinola M; Atlas L; Barch DM; Barrett LF; Borelli JL; Brannon TN; Bunge SA; Campos B; Cantlon J; Carter R; Carter-Sowell AR; Chen S; Craske MG; Cuddy AJC; Crum A; Davachi L; Duckworth AL; Dutra SJ; Eisenberger NI; Ferguson M; Ford BQ; Fredrickson BL; Goodman SH; Gopnik A; Greenaway VP; Harkness KL; Hebl M; Heller W; Hooley J; Jampol L; Johnson SL; Joormann J; Kinzler KD; Kober H; Kring AM; Paluck EL; Lombrozo T; Lourenco SF; McRae K; Monin JK; Moskowitz JT; Natsuaki MN; Oettingen G; Pfeifer JH; Prause N; Saxbe D; Smith PK; Spellman BA; Sturm V; Teachman BA; Thompson RJ; Weinstock LM; Williams LA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 May; 16(3):483-516. PubMed ID: 32901575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender.
    Box-Steffensmeier JM; Cunha RC; Varbanov RA; Hoh YS; Knisley ML; Holmes MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143093. PubMed ID: 26580565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists.
    Régner I; Thinus-Blanc C; Netter A; Schmader T; Huguet P
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Nov; 3(11):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 31451735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ladies First? Not So Fast: Linguistic Sexism in Peer-Reviewed Research.
    Willis M; Jozkowski KN
    J Sex Res; 2018 Feb; 55(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 28753394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science.
    Kirby CK; Jaimes P; Lorenz-Reaves AR; Libarkin JC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209311. PubMed ID: 30601856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explaining academic-track boys' underachievement in language grades: Not a lack of aptitude but students' motivational beliefs and parents' perceptions?
    Heyder A; Kessels U; Steinmayr R
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2017 Jun; 87(2):205-223. PubMed ID: 28197995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field-specific ability beliefs as an explanation for gender differences in academics' career trajectories: Evidence from public profiles on ORCID.Org.
    Hannak A; Joseph K; Larremore DB; Cimpian A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 125(4):681-698. PubMed ID: 37347899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.
    Fanelli D
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10068. PubMed ID: 20383332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graduate entry to medicine in Iran.
    Nedjat S; Majdzadeh R; Rashidian A
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 8():47. PubMed ID: 18847497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia.
    Shaw AK; Stanton DE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1743):3736-41. PubMed ID: 22719028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The natural science ideal in the social sciences.
    BECK LW
    Sci Mon; 1949 Jun; 68(6):386-94. PubMed ID: 18145028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teaching accreditation exams reveal grading biases favor women in male-dominated disciplines in France.
    Breda T; Hillion M
    Science; 2016 Jul; 353(6298):474-8. PubMed ID: 27471301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention.
    Girod S; Fassiotto M; Grewal D; Ku MC; Sriram N; Nosek BA; Valantine H
    Acad Med; 2016 Aug; 91(8):1143-50. PubMed ID: 26826068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls.
    Leaper C; Brown CS
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(3):685-704. PubMed ID: 18489421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.