These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26207104)

  • 1. Benchmarking the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism on a Standard Organic Molecular Set.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jul; 11(7):3290-304. PubMed ID: 26207104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GW and Bethe-Salpeter study of small water clusters.
    Blase X; Boulanger P; Bruneval F; Fernandez-Serra M; Duchemin I
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Jan; 144(3):034109. PubMed ID: 26801022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accurate Prediction of the S
    Kshirsagar AR; D'Avino G; Blase X; Li J; Poloni R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 32097003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism.
    Gui X; Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 29499116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmark Many-Body GW and Bethe-Salpeter Calculations for Small Transition Metal Molecules.
    Körbel S; Boulanger P; Duchemin I; Blase X; Marques MA; Botti S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Sep; 10(9):3934-43. PubMed ID: 26588537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An optimally tuned range-separated hybrid starting point for ab initio GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations of molecules.
    McKeon CA; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 157(7):074103. PubMed ID: 35987597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. All-electron ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to neutral excitations in molecules with numeric atom-centered orbitals.
    Liu C; Kloppenburg J; Yao Y; Ren X; Appel H; Kanai Y; Blum V
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jan; 152(4):044105. PubMed ID: 32007075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking the GW Approximation and Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Groups IB and IIB Atoms and Monoxides.
    Hung L; Bruneval F; Baishya K; Öğüt S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 28387124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmark of Bethe-Salpeter for Triplet Excited-States.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blondel A; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Feb; 13(2):767-783. PubMed ID: 28107000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quasiparticle Self-Consistent
    Förster A; Visscher L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6779-6793. PubMed ID: 36201788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and Accurate Electronic Excitations in Cyanines with the Many-Body Bethe-Salpeter Approach.
    Boulanger P; Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Mar; 10(3):1212-8. PubMed ID: 26580191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic benchmark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small organic molecules.
    Bruneval F; Hamed SM; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(24):244101. PubMed ID: 26133404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-Electron BSE@
    Yao Y; Golze D; Rinke P; Blum V; Kanai Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Mar; 18(3):1569-1583. PubMed ID: 35138865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Many-body Green's function GW and Bethe-Salpeter study of the optical excitations in a paradigmatic model dipeptide.
    Faber C; Boulanger P; Duchemin I; Attaccalite C; Blase X
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(19):194308. PubMed ID: 24320327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism Accurate for Excitation Energies? Comparisons with TD-DFT, CASPT2, and EOM-CCSD.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2017 Apr; 8(7):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 28301726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Role of the Kohn-Sham Density in the Calculation of the Low-Lying Bethe-Salpeter Excitation Energies.
    Kshirsagar AR; Poloni R
    J Phys Chem A; 2023 Mar; 127(11):2618-2627. PubMed ID: 36913525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 May; 11(9):3536-3545. PubMed ID: 32298578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of low-lying excitation energies and triplet instabilities of organic molecules with an ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach and the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.
    Rangel T; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2017 May; 146(19):194108. PubMed ID: 28527441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Koopmans Meets Bethe-Salpeter: Excitonic Optical Spectra without GW.
    Elliott JD; Colonna N; Marsili M; Marzari N; Umari P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jun; 15(6):3710-3720. PubMed ID: 30998361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.