292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26207651)
1. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use?
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2132-2151. PubMed ID: 26207651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
J Pain; 2018 Aug; 19(8):862-872. PubMed ID: 29551662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishing intra- and inter-rater agreement of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale for evaluating pain in toddlers during immunization.
Gomez RJ; Barrowman N; Elia S; Manias E; Royle J; Harrison D
Pain Res Manag; 2013; 18(6):e124-8. PubMed ID: 24308028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Hutchinson A; Schuster T; Santamaria N; Babl FE
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016225. PubMed ID: 28882914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Where Are We: A Systematic Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Pain Assessment Scales for Use in Chinese Children.
Bai J; Jiang N
Pain Manag Nurs; 2015 Aug; 16(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 26256224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.
Voepel-Lewis T; Zanotti J; Dammeyer JA; Merkel S
Am J Crit Care; 2010 Jan; 19(1):55-61; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 20045849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pain assessment tools in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and recommendations for clinical practice.
Chan AY; Ge M; Harrop E; Johnson M; Oulton K; Skene SS; Wong IC; Jamieson L; Howard RF; Liossi C
Palliat Med; 2022 Jan; 36(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 34965753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.
Matsuishi Y; Hoshino H; Shimojo N; Enomoto Y; Kido T; Hoshino T; Sumitani M; Inoue Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194094. PubMed ID: 29534083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS).
Crellin DJ; Babl FE; Santamaria N; Harrison D
J Pediatr Nurs; 2018; 40():14-26. PubMed ID: 29776475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of the Korean Version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale for Assessment of Pain in Dementia Patients.
Moon Y; Kim YS; Lee J; Han SH
J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1852-1856. PubMed ID: 28960040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment.
Peng T; Qu S; Du Z; Chen Z; Xiao T; Chen R
J Pain Res; 2023; 16():1185-1196. PubMed ID: 37064956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability of two pain assessment tools in Brazilian children and adolescents.
da Silva FC; Santos Thuler LC; de Leon-Casasola OA
J Clin Nurs; 2011 Jul; 20(13-14):1842-8. PubMed ID: 21564357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children.
Babl FE; Crellin D; Cheng J; Sullivan TP; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1281-96. PubMed ID: 23187981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.
Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Burke C; Merkel S; Tait AR
Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Mar; 16(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 16490089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and assessment of postoperative pain in children with cognitive impairment: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Pizzinato A; Liguoro I; Pusiol A; Cogo P; Palese A; Vidal E
Eur J Pain; 2022 May; 26(5):965-979. PubMed ID: 35271756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.
Voepel-Lewis T; Merkel S; Tait AR; Trzcinka A; Malviya S
Anesth Analg; 2002 Nov; 95(5):1224-9, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12401598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian estimation on diagnostic performance of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability and Neonatal Infant Pain Scale for infant pain assessment in the absence of a gold standard.
Ge X; Tao JR; Wang J; Pan SM; Wang YW
Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Aug; 25(8):834-839. PubMed ID: 25929312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.
Nilsson S; Finnström B; Kokinsky E
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Aug; 18(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 18613934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The measurement properties of pediatric observational pain scales: A systematic review of reviews.
Andersen RD; Langius-Eklöf A; Nakstad B; Bernklev T; Jylli L
Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Aug; 73():93-101. PubMed ID: 28558342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.
Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR; Merkel S; Foster R; Krane EJ; Davis PJ
Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):72-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
