These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26207915)

  • 1. Contextual Congruency Effect in Natural Scene Categorization: Different Strategies in Humans and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Collet AC; Fize D; VanRullen R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133721. PubMed ID: 26207915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference.
    Joubert OR; Rousselet GA; Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3286-97. PubMed ID: 17967472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of amplitude and phase spectra-defined scene statistics to the masking of rapid scene categorization.
    Hansen BC; Loschky LC
    J Vis; 2013 Nov; 13(13):21. PubMed ID: 24259673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise.
    Joubert OR; Rousselet GA; Fabre-Thorpe M; Fize D
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):2.1-16. PubMed ID: 19271872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes.
    Joubert OR; Fize D; Rousselet GA; Fabre-Thorpe M
    J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(13):11.1-18. PubMed ID: 19146341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes.
    Sun HM; Simon-Dack SL; Gordon RD; Teder WA
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1398():40-54. PubMed ID: 21621195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Humans and monkeys share visual representations.
    Fize D; Cauchoix M; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(18):7635-40. PubMed ID: 21502509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing context: Asymmetric interference of visual form and texture in object and scene interactions.
    Lowe MX; Ferber S; Cant JS
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():34-40. PubMed ID: 26499389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects.
    Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):11.1-11. PubMed ID: 20377288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects.
    Walker S; Stafford P; Davis G
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):21.1-12. PubMed ID: 18484860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face detection in contextual scenes.
    Prunty J; Jenkins R; Qarooni R; Bindemann M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304288. PubMed ID: 38865378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ObScene database: Semantic congruency norms for 898 pairs of object-scene pictures.
    Andrade MÂ; Cipriano M; Raposo A
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3058-3071. PubMed ID: 37488464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: a life-span study.
    Rémy F; Saint-Aubert L; Bacon-Macé N; Vayssière N; Barbeau E; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():36-44. PubMed ID: 23891714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spotting animals in natural scenes: efficiency of humans and monkeys at very low contrasts.
    Macé MJ; Delorme A; Richard G; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):405-18. PubMed ID: 19921288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?
    Sastyin G; Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):856-66. PubMed ID: 25522833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonaccidental properties underlie human categorization of complex natural scenes.
    Walther DB; Shen D
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 24474725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down preparation modulates visual categorization but not subjective awareness of objects presented in natural backgrounds.
    Koivisto M; Kahila E
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():73-80. PubMed ID: 28202397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
    Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localized information is necessary for scene categorization, including the Natural/Man-made distinction.
    Loschky LC; Larson AM
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):4.1-9. PubMed ID: 18318607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects.
    Dyck M; Brodeur MB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():43-51. PubMed ID: 25911127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.