These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26208404)

  • 1. Retrospective cues based on object features improve visual working memory performance in older adults.
    Gilchrist AL; Duarte A; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 26208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1120-1147. PubMed ID: 38627277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.
    Guillory SB; Gliga T; Kaldy Z
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():146-161. PubMed ID: 29175705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What you don't know can't hurt you: Retro-cues benefit working memory regardless of prior knowledge in long-term memory.
    Loaiza VM; Cheung HW; Goldenhaus-Manning DT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1-12. PubMed ID: 37932579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the role of attention during feature binding in visuospatial working memory.
    Goldenhaus-Manning DT; Cooper NR; Loaiza VM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):354-365. PubMed ID: 36720780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the role of action-driven attention in ensemble processing.
    Knox K; Pratt J; Cant JS
    J Vis; 2024 Jun; 24(6):5. PubMed ID: 38842835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: advantage of peripheral over central cues.
    Han S; Zhou H; Tian Y; Ku Y
    Prog Neurobiol; 2023 Nov; 230():102521. PubMed ID: 37673370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of real-time stability supports visual working memory performance: Young children's feature binding can be improved through perceptual structure.
    Simmering VR; Wood CM
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Aug; 53(8):1474-1493. PubMed ID: 28627904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory? Examining the biased attentional refreshing account.
    Atkinson AL; Oberauer K; Allen RJ; Souza AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):891-900. PubMed ID: 35091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Be prepared for interruptions: EEG correlates of anticipation when dealing with task interruptions and the role of aging.
    Ülkü S; Getzmann S; Wascher E; Schneider D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5679. PubMed ID: 38454047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal orienting of attention can be preserved in normal aging.
    Chauvin JJ; Gillebert CR; Rohenkohl G; Humphreys GW; Nobre AC
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):442-55. PubMed ID: 27294712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resolving Age-Related Differences in Working Memory: Equating Perception and Attention Makes Older Adults Remember as Well as Younger Adults.
    Verhaeghen P; Geigerman S; Yang H; Montoya AC; Rahnev D
    Exp Aging Res; 2019; 45(2):120-134. PubMed ID: 30849028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting attention to locations in mental representations.
    Astle DE; Summerfield J; Griffin I; Nobre AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):146-62. PubMed ID: 21972046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age Differences in the Efficiency of Filtering and Ignoring Distraction in Visual Working Memory.
    Maniglia MR; Souza AS
    Brain Sci; 2020 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 32824098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exogenous Bimodal Cues Attenuate Age-Related Audiovisual Integration.
    Ren Y; Zhang Y; Hou Y; Li J; Bi J; Yang W
    Iperception; 2021; 12(3):20416695211020768. PubMed ID: 34104386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The response-signal method reveals age-related changes in object working memory.
    Kumar A; Rakitin BC; Nambisan R; Habeck C; Stern Y
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):315-29. PubMed ID: 18573006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory.
    Chen Z; Sun Q; Li X
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 36436109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infants get five stars on iconic memory tests: a partial-report test of 6-month-old infants' iconic memory capacity.
    Blaser E; Kaldy Z
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1643-5. PubMed ID: 20923928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory and aging across cultures.
    Gutchess A; Cho I
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Feb; 55():101728. PubMed ID: 38029643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.