831 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26208579)
1. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Consensus Guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery in Stages 1 and 2 Invasive Breast Cancer.
Chung A; Gangi A; Amersi F; Bose S; Zhang X; Giuliano A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S422-7. PubMed ID: 26310280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive Margins After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer.
Clough KB; Gouveia PF; Benyahi D; Massey EJ; Russ E; Sarfati I; Nos C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4247-53. PubMed ID: 25893409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast conservative surgery and local recurrence.
Rezai M; Kraemer S; Kimmig R; Kern P
Breast; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 2():S100-7. PubMed ID: 26432359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Retroglandular Oncoplastic Technique as a Standard Level I Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Retrospective Clinicopathologic Study of 102 Patients With Breast Cancer.
Mátrai Z; Újhelyi M; Kovács T; Kelemen P; Sávolt Á; Kovács E; Éles K; Mészáros N; Kenessey I; Stamatiou A; Pukancsik D
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(3):e459-e467. PubMed ID: 30992191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast-Conserving Surgery in Bilateral Breast Cancer.
O'Brien JA; Ho A; Wright GP; Stempel M; Patil S; Krause K; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3389-96. PubMed ID: 26265365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of Residual Tumor in Breast-Conserving Therapy.
Rath MG; Uhlmann L; Heil J; Domschke C; Roth Z; Sinn HP; Marme F; Scharf A; Schneeweiss A; Kieser M; Sohn C; Rom J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S451-8. PubMed ID: 26224405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcome of oncoplastic techniques in defect reconstruction after resection of central breast tumors.
Farouk O; Attia E; Roshdy S; Khater A; Senbe A; Fathi A; Hamed EE; Mesbah M; Shehatto F; El-Saed A; Denewer A
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 13():285. PubMed ID: 26409877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term Results After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer: A 10-year Follow-up.
Clough KB; van la Parra RFD; Thygesen HH; Levy E; Russ E; Halabi NM; Sarfati I; Nos C
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 28448389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of atypical hyperplasia at margins of breast-conserving surgery on the recurrence of breast cancer.
Li S; Liu J; Yang Y; Zeng Y; Deng H; Jia H; Li Q; Feng H; Li Y; Song E; Liu Q; Su F
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2014 Apr; 140(4):599-605. PubMed ID: 24509653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
