These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26208721)

  • 1. Using video in childbirth research.
    Harte JD; Homer CS; Sheehan A; Leap N; Foureur M
    Nurs Ethics; 2017 Mar; 24(2):177-189. PubMed ID: 26208721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Childbirth Supporters' Experiences in a Built Hospital Birth Environment: Exploring Inhibiting and Facilitating Factors in Negotiating the Supporter Role.
    Harte JD; Sheehan A; Stewart SC; Foureur M
    HERD; 2016 Apr; 9(3):135-61. PubMed ID: 26794236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Room4Birth - the effect of an adaptable birthing room on labour and birth outcomes for nulliparous women at term with spontaneous labour start: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial in Sweden.
    Berg M; Goldkuhl L; Nilsson C; Wijk H; Gyllensten H; Lindahl G; Uvnäs Moberg K; Begley C
    Trials; 2019 Nov; 20(1):629. PubMed ID: 31744523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malawi women's knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions: A cross-sectional descriptive survey.
    Zileni BD; Glover P; Jones M; Teoh KK; Zileni CW; Muller A
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 27329996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How domesticity dictates behaviour in the birth space: Lessons for designing birth environments in institutions wanting to promote a positive experience of birth.
    Mondy T; Fenwick J; Leap N; Foureur M
    Midwifery; 2016 Dec; 43():37-47. PubMed ID: 27842228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conflicting contexts: midwives' interpretation of childbirth through photo elicitation.
    Copeland F; Dahlen HG; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 24373599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care.
    Ebert L; Bellchambers H; Ferguson A; Browne J
    Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24355713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The delivery room: is it a safe place? A hermeneutic analysis of women's negative birth experiences.
    Nilsson C
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Dec; 5(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 25433832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's expectations and experiences with labour pain in medical and midwifery models of birth in the United States.
    Gibson E
    Women Birth; 2014 Sep; 27(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 24933526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intimate space within institutionalized birth: women's experiences birthing with doulas.
    Hunter C
    Anthropol Med; 2012; 19(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 22870904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timorese women's experiences and expectations of skilled birth attendance in Timor-Leste: A qualitative inquiry.
    King R; Jones L
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2022 Sep; 33():100761. PubMed ID: 36037668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Jordanian women's experiences and constructions of labour and birth in different settings, over time and across generations: a qualitative study.
    Hussein SAAA; Dahlen HG; Ogunsiji O; Schmied V
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):357. PubMed ID: 32522158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Western Australian women.
    Fenwick J; Hauck Y; Downie J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2005 Mar; 21(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 15740814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom.
    Milosevic S; Channon S; Hughes J; Hunter B; Nolan M; Milton R; Sanders J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):719. PubMed ID: 33228569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Childbirth at home: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of risk and risk management among Baloch women in Iran.
    Abed Saeedi Z; Ghazi Tabatabaie M; Moudi Z; Vedadhir AA; Navidian A
    Midwifery; 2013 Jan; 29(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 22172740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision-making in Swiss home-like childbirth: A grounded theory study.
    Meyer Y; Frank F; Schläppy Muntwyler F; Fleming V; Pehlke-Milde J
    Women Birth; 2017 Dec; 30(6):e272-e280. PubMed ID: 28624364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hardware and software implications of hospital birth room design: a midwifery perspective.
    Hammond A; Foureur M; Homer CS
    Midwifery; 2014 Jul; 30(7):825-30. PubMed ID: 23932739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Birthing outside the system: perceptions of risk amongst Australian women who have freebirths and high risk homebirths.
    Jackson M; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):561-7. PubMed ID: 22300611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not addressing the root cause: An analysis of submissions made to the South Australian Government on a Proposal to Protect Midwifery Practice.
    Rigg E; Schmied V; Peters K; Dahlen H
    Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 25605583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The birth bed: A qualitative study on the views of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space.
    Townsend B; Fenwick J; Thomson V; Foureur M
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 26386523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.