BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26209119)

  • 1. Variation in cervical and breast cancer screening coverage in England: a cross-sectional analysis to characterise districts with atypical behaviour.
    Massat NJ; Douglas E; Waller J; Wardle J; Duffy SW
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e007735. PubMed ID: 26209119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: are we closing the gap?
    Douglas E; Waller J; Duffy SW; Wardle J
    J Med Screen; 2016 Jun; 23(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 26377810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study on the coverage of cervical and breast cancer screening among women aged 35-69 years and related impact of socioeconomic factors in China, 2013].
    Bao HL; Wang LH; Wang LM; Fang LW; Zhang M; Zhao ZP; Cong S
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 39(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 29495207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England.
    Bang JY; Yadegarfar G; Soljak M; Majeed A
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Dec; 34(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 22518028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social disparities in access to breast and cervical cancer screening by women living in Spain.
    Ricardo-Rodrigues I; Jiménez-García R; Hernández-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Jiménez-Trujillo I; López de Andrés A
    Public Health; 2015 Jul; 129(7):881-8. PubMed ID: 25818014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.
    Ghanouni A; Renzi C; Waller J
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Apr; 17(1):327. PubMed ID: 28420378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An epidemiological study of cervical and breast screening in India: district-level analysis.
    Monica ; Mishra R
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):225. PubMed ID: 33028336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Le disuguaglianze di accesso ai programmi di screening dei tumori della mammella, del colon retto e della cervice uterina sono aumentate durante il periodo pandemico. Risultati di un health equity audit condotto dall'Agenzia di Tutela della Salute d.
    Girardi D; Vecchio R; Tanious M; Cacitti S; Ancarani C; Dalle Carbonare S; Perotti P; Bonafede C; Cavallo R; Gentile L; Parrini A; Lucente EM; Carlesso A; Cadum E; Cecconami L; Odone A; Deandrea S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2024; 48(2):130-139. PubMed ID: 38770730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent participation in screening for cervical, breast, and bowel cancer in England.
    Rebolj M; Parmar D; Maroni R; Blyuss O; Duffy SW
    J Med Screen; 2020 Mar; 27(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 31525303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invitation coverage and participation in Italian cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening programmes.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Carrozzi G; Federici A; Mancuso P; Sampaolo L; Zappa M
    J Med Screen; 2018 Mar; 25(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 28614991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
    Kernohan EE
    Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015.
    Choi E; Lee YY; Suh M; Lee EY; Mai TTX; Ki M; Oh JK; Cho H; Park B; Jun JK; Kim Y; Choi KS
    Yonsei Med J; 2018 Nov; 59(9):1026-1033. PubMed ID: 30328316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data.
    Moser K; Patnick J; Beral V
    BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2025. PubMed ID: 19531549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials examining the effectiveness of breast and cervical cancer screening interventions for ethnic minority women.
    Chan DN; So WK
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Oct; 19(5):536-53. PubMed ID: 25840817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.
    Horner-Johnson W; Dobbertin K; Iezzoni LI
    Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25864023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do general practitioners influence the uptake of breast cancer screening?
    Majeed FA; Cook DG; Given-Wilson R; Vecchi P; Poloniecki J
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 8536178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How district health authorities organise cervical screening.
    Elkind A; Eardley A; Thompson R; Smith A
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):915-8. PubMed ID: 2261539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cancer worries and uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A population-based survey in England.
    Quaife SL; Waller J; von Wagner C; Vrinten C
    J Med Screen; 2019 Mar; 26(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 30249158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethnic disparities in knowledge of cancer screening programmes in the UK.
    Robb K; Wardle J; Stubbings S; Ramirez A; Austoker J; Macleod U; Hiom S; Waller J
    J Med Screen; 2010; 17(3):125-31. PubMed ID: 20956722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.