These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26209301)

  • 1. Virtual collaboration: effect of spatial configuration on spatial statements production.
    Pouliquen-Lardy L; Mars F; Guillaume F; Milleville-Pennel I
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():337-42. PubMed ID: 26209301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategies for human-driven robot comprehension of spatial descriptions by older adults in a robot fetch task.
    Carlson L; Skubic M; Miller J; Huo Z; Alexenko T
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jul; 6(3):513-33. PubMed ID: 24948449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extrinsic reference frames modify the neural substrates of object-location representations.
    Chan E; Baumann O; Bellgrove MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):781-8. PubMed ID: 23422330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using virtual environment to improve spatial perception by people who are blind.
    Lahav O
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Apr; 9(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 16640474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction between reference frames during subjective vertical estimates in a tilted immersive virtual environment.
    Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Lepecq JC; Sandor PM; Pergandi JM; Mestre D
    Perception; 2009; 38(7):1053-71. PubMed ID: 19764307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geometric cues, reference frames, and the equivalence of experienced-aligned and novel-aligned views in human spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Sjolund LA; Sturz BR
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 23305700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stepping into a map: initial heading direction influences spatial memory flexibility.
    Gagnon SA; Brunyé TT; Gardony A; Noordzij ML; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Cogn Sci; 2014 Mar; 38(2):275-302. PubMed ID: 23855500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing ahead: experience and language in spatial perspective.
    Alloway TP; Corley M; Ramscar M
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):380-6. PubMed ID: 16752601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing perspective: The role of vestibular signals.
    Deroualle D; Borel L; Devèze A; Lopez C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Dec; 79(Pt B):175-85. PubMed ID: 26311354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous navigational strategies and performance in the virtual town.
    Etchamendy N; Bohbot VD
    Hippocampus; 2007; 17(8):595-9. PubMed ID: 17546682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How different spatial representations interact in virtual environments: the role of mental frame syncing.
    Serino S; Riva G
    Cogn Process; 2015 May; 16(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 25663561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object orientation affects spatial language comprehension.
    Burigo M; Sacchi S
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(8):1471-92. PubMed ID: 23676080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in human virtual water maze performance: novel measures reveal the relative contribution of directional responding and spatial knowledge.
    Woolley DG; Vermaercke B; Op de Beeck H; Wagemans J; Gantois I; D'Hooge R; Swinnen SP; Wenderoth N
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 20035800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial radial maze procedures and setups to dissociate local and distal relational spatial frameworks in humans.
    Bertholet L; Escobar MT; Depré M; Chavan CF; Giuliani F; Gisquet-Verrier P; Preissmann D; Schenk F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Sep; 253():126-41. PubMed ID: 26096715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental transformations of spatial stimuli in humans and in monkeys: rotation vs. translocation.
    Nekovarova T; Nedvidek J; Klement D; Rokyta R; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 240():182-91. PubMed ID: 23174207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An implicit spatial memory alignment effect.
    Cerles M; Gomez A; Rousset S
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():179-83. PubMed ID: 26233526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudoneglect in back space.
    Cocchini G; Watling R; Della Sala S; Jansari A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16934381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces.
    Meilinger T; Riecke BE; Bülthoff HH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):542-69. PubMed ID: 23972144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task.
    Ranjbar Pouya O; Byagowi A; Kelly DM; Moussavi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1406-1419. PubMed ID: 27156658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visuospatial perspective taking in a dynamic environment: perceiving moving objects from a first-person-perspective induces a disposition to act.
    Kockler H; Scheef L; Tepest R; David N; Bewernick BH; Newen A; Schild HH; May M; Vogeley K
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Sep; 19(3):690-701. PubMed ID: 20363157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.