These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26209881)

  • 1. The development of a fast method for recording Schroeder-phase masking functions.
    Rahmat S; O'Beirne GA
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):125-33. PubMed ID: 26209881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 9606069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical and modeling approaches towards determining the cochlear phase response based on interaural time differences.
    Tabuchi H; Laback B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4314. PubMed ID: 28618834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical estimates of cochlear phase response: masking by harmonic complexes.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 2(4):408-22. PubMed ID: 11833613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Spahr AJ; Bacon SP; Skarzynski H; Lorens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2164-73. PubMed ID: 19062856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Off-frequency listening in subjects with chronic tinnitus.
    Kiani F; Yoganantha U; Tan CM; Meddis R; Schaette R
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():1-10. PubMed ID: 24012951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic analyses of cochlear mechanisms in tinnitus patients with normal auditory thresholds.
    Buzo BC; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24168288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):352-66. PubMed ID: 14534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Tarasewicz E
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masking effects in patients with auditory neuropathy-possible involvement of suppression mechanism caused by normal outer hair cell function.
    Oda K; Kawase T; Takata Y; Miyazaki H; Hidaka H; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 23739557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of auditory processing in 6- to 11-yr-old children.
    Moore DR; Cowan JA; Riley A; Edmondson-Jones AM; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 21233712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical tuning curves at very high frequencies.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2498-506. PubMed ID: 16266170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase-dependent audiometry with low-frequency masking revisited.
    Rahne T; Rasinski C; Neumann K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20171987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.