These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26210351)

  • 1. Elaborations for the Validation of Causal Bridging Inferences in Text Comprehension.
    Morishima Y
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):961-77. PubMed ID: 26210351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When birds and sias fly: A neural indicator of inferring a word meaning in context.
    Rodríguez-Gómez P; Martínez-García N; Pozo MA; Hinojosa JA; Moreno EM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():163-170. PubMed ID: 28962870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online inferential and textual processing by adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during reading comprehension: Evidence from a probing method.
    Yeari M; Avramovich A; Schiff R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Jun; 39(5):485-501. PubMed ID: 27681540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory.
    Irrazabal N; Burin D
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Mar; 19():E11. PubMed ID: 26972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts.
    Van Boekel M; Lassonde KA; O'Brien EJ; Kendeou P
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):168-181. PubMed ID: 27585919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating presupposed versus focused text information.
    Singer M; Solar KG; Spear J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):456-479. PubMed ID: 27913966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements.
    Chen L; Paterson KB; Li X; Li L; Yang Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Dec; 72(12):2742-2751. PubMed ID: 31184264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach.
    Kendeou P; Butterfuss R; Kim J; Van Boekel M
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 30117115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of strongly presupposed text concepts in reading comprehension: Cleft constructions.
    Singer M; Spear J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31647253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updating during reading comprehension: why causality matters.
    Kendeou P; Smith ER; O'Brien EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):854-65. PubMed ID: 22845069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric processing of predictive inferences: the influence of reading goals and textual constraint.
    Virtue S; Motyka Joss L
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 8(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 27291098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferential revision in narrative texts: An ERP study.
    Pérez A; Cain K; Castellanos MC; Bajo T
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1105-35. PubMed ID: 26047776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of bridging inferences and coherence processing.
    Kim SI; Yoon M; Kim W; Lee S; Kang E
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2012 Aug; 41(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22113486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference vs control sentences: are readers able to detect our intended differences?
    Shears C; Weiss E
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 15708216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of phonological loop on inferential processing during Chinese text reading: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Wang W; Fan L; Wang Z; Liu X; Zhang S
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):521-533. PubMed ID: 33934520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relation of Knowledge-Text Integration Processes and Reading Comprehension in 7th- to 12th-Grade Students.
    Barnes MA; Ahmed Y; Barth A; Francis DJ
    Sci Stud Read; 2015; 19(4):253-272. PubMed ID: 26997861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing.
    Singer M; Ritchot KF
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8961818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the violation of causal, emotional, and locative inferences: An event-related potentials study.
    Rodríguez-Gómez P; Sánchez-Carmona A; Smith C; Pozo MA; Hinojosa JA; Moreno EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():25-34. PubMed ID: 27150706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric processing of inferences: the effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity.
    Virtue S; van den Broek P; Linderholm T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1341-54. PubMed ID: 17225513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural indicators of inference processes in text comprehension: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Friese U; Rutschmann R; Raabe M; Schmalhofer F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2110-24. PubMed ID: 18416672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.