These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26210815)

  • 21. Just ask: a proposal to hone the indications for sophisticated radiology examinations.
    Bernstein J; Lexa FJ
    J Med Pract Manage; 2010; 25(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 20695248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm imaging by using time and motion analyses.
    Rubin GD; Armerding MD; Dake MD; Napel S
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 10751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The costs and utility of imaging in evaluating dizzy patients in the emergency room.
    Ahsan SF; Syamal MN; Yaremchuk K; Peterson E; Seidman M
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Sep; 123(9):2250-3. PubMed ID: 23821602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The costs of CT procedures in an academic radiology department determined by an activity-based costing (ABC) method.
    Nisenbaum HL; Birnbaum BA; Myers MM; Grossman RI; Gefter WB; Langlotz CP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(5):813-23. PubMed ID: 11045708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health policy analysis and magnetic resonance imaging. The case of the New York State Demonstration Project.
    Milliren JW
    Clin Imaging; 1989 Mar; 13(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 2743187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cost considerations for whole-body MRI and PET/CT as part of oncologic staging].
    Plathow C; Walz M; Lichy MP; Aschoff P; Pfannenberg C; Bock H; Eschmann SM; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
    Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):384-96. PubMed ID: 17891370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Indeterminate liver and renal lesions: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in providing a definitive diagnosis and impact on recommendations for additional imaging.
    Margolis NE; Shaver CM; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):882-6. PubMed ID: 24270109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The disproportionate effects of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on radiologists' private office MRI and CT practices compared with those of other physicians.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 19720356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
    ; ;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies.
    Alanen J; Keski-Nisula L; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Jan; 14(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 12827428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic imaging and spending review: extreme problems call for extreme measures.
    Ciarrapico AM; Ugenti R; Di Minco L; Santori E; Altobelli S; Coco I; D'Onofrio S; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 28070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison between estimates of radiological workload].
    Bibbolino C; Cristofaro M; Lauria FN; Petrecchia A; Vimercati F; David V
    Radiol Med; 2001; 102(5-6):391-6. PubMed ID: 11779989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Economic impact of replacing CT with MR imaging for refractory epilepsy.
    Bronen RA; Fulbright RK; Spencer SS; Spencer DD; Kim JH; Lange RC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(7):857-62. PubMed ID: 9309616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Whole-body MR imaging versus sequential multimodal diagnostic algorithm for staging patients with rectal cancer: cost analysis.
    Huppertz A; Schmidt M; Wagner M; Puettcher O; Asbach P; Strassburg J; Stöckmann F; Schöffski O; Maurer MH
    Rofo; 2010 Sep; 182(9):793-802. PubMed ID: 20517819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. National audit of appropriate imaging.
    Remedios D; Drinkwater K; Warwick R;
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Oct; 69(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25037149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Should the ordering of medical imaging examinations be reexamined?
    Margulis AR; Bhargavan M; Feldman D; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Oct; 2(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 17411937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost-effectiveness of unenhanced MR imaging vs contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or pelvis.
    Lessler DS; Sullivan SD; Stergachis A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 8010246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deployment and utilization of MR imaging in Michigan: observations of a statewide data base.
    Doughty A; Nash SI; Gift DA
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1523335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of radiology in U.S. general short-term hospitals: 1980-1990.
    Mettler FA; Briggs JE; Carchman R; Altobelli KK; Hart BL; Kelsey CA
    Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 8210363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.