These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2621086)
1. Matter of Westchester Medical Center (O'Connor). Barkow JM Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 2621086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies. Gasner MR J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 2332578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Robertson ED Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill? Rizzo RF N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When is medical treatment "futile"? Bennett AJ Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A judge's perspective: the New York rulings. Wachtler S Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):60-2. PubMed ID: 1895766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intention, action, and the dead donor rule: commentary on Spike. DuBois JM J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):78-84; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 10904895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to die. Powell JA; Cohen AS Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Cruzan case revisited. Crombie HD Conn Med; 2003; 67(10):633-4. PubMed ID: 14677343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept? Liacos PJ Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The dilemma of euthanasia. Abyad AR J Med Liban; 1994; 42(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7616561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of the legacy of Karen Ann Quinlan. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 8453247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal and ethical guidelines for physicians in geriatric terminal care. Rouse F Geriatrics; 1988 Aug; 43(8):69-70, 74-5. PubMed ID: 3402738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance. Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bringing bioethics theory to the bedside. Bell H Minn Med; 1997 Nov; 80(11):20-5. PubMed ID: 9385809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die? Denbo SM Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical futility police: head 'em off at the impasse. Mayo TW Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):23-6, 36. PubMed ID: 7950140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]