These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

730 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26210864)

  • 1. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
    Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
    Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
    Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients.
    Tan S; Yu M; Baig N; Hansapinyo L; Tham CC
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42067. PubMed ID: 28165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
    Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential impact of prostaglandin analogues on agreement of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation, rebound, and noncontact tonometry.
    Jung Y; Suh H; Moon JI
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):436. PubMed ID: 34915877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements.
    Esporcatte BL; Lopes FS; Fonseca Netto C; Rebouças-Santos V; Dias DT; Marujo FI; Rolim-de-Moura C
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 26677038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of 898 Eyes.
    Bao B; Diaconita V; Schulz DC; Hutnik C
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 32672578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
    Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.