714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26210864)
1. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer.
Jablonski KS; Rosentreter A; Gaki S; Lappas A; Dietlein TS
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):763-7. PubMed ID: 23172572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of IcareONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.
Sakamoto M; Kanamori A; Fujihara M; Yamada Y; Nakamura M; Negi A
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 92(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23586927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients.
Tan S; Yu M; Baig N; Hansapinyo L; Tham CC
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42067. PubMed ID: 28165028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential impact of prostaglandin analogues on agreement of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by Goldmann applanation, rebound, and noncontact tonometry.
Jung Y; Suh H; Moon JI
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):436. PubMed ID: 34915877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements.
Esporcatte BL; Lopes FS; Fonseca Netto C; Rebouças-Santos V; Dias DT; Marujo FI; Rolim-de-Moura C
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 26677038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Comparison of 898 Eyes.
Bao B; Diaconita V; Schulz DC; Hutnik C
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 32672578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
