These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26211003)

  • 1. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis.
    Zheng C; Yang H; Luo J; Xiong B; Wang H; Jiang Q
    Urolithiasis; 2015 Nov; 43(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 26211003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
    Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; (11):CD007044. PubMed ID: 25418417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
    Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis.
    Zheng C; Xiong B; Wang H; Luo J; Zhang C; Wei W; Wang Y
    Urol Int; 2014; 93(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 25170589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
    Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.
    Mi Y; Ren K; Pan H; Zhu L; Wu S; You X; Shao H; Dai F; Peng T; Qin F; Wang J; Huang Y
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 26530230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kim CH; Chung DY; Rha KH; Lee JY; Lee SH
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Dec; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33396839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and Safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Urinary Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Yuan C; Jian Z; Jin X; Ma Y; Li H; Wang K
    J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 32972194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A
    Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.
    Kallidonis P; Adamou C; Ntasiotis P; Pietropaolo A; Somani B; Özsoy M; Liourdi D; Sarica K; Liatsikos E; Tailly T
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 73(6):711-723. PubMed ID: 34156200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones.
    Jung H; Nørby B; Osther PJ
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 17060084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy before retrograde intrarenal surgery complicates the surgery for upper ureter stone? The results of the RIRSearch group.
    Yazici CM; Siddikoglu D; Cinar O; Ozman O; Basatac C; Akgul M; Sancak EB; Onal B; Akpinar H
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 May; 75(5):e14115. PubMed ID: 33636023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Hou J; Xu F; Du H; Liu J; Li N
    Int J Surg; 2023 Mar; 109(3):383-388. PubMed ID: 36906759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole renal stones?].
    Rojas A; Gallegos H; Salvadó JA
    Medwave; 2015 Sep; 15 Suppl 2():e6254. PubMed ID: 26352272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of micro-PERC and retrograde intrarenal surgery results in pediatric patients with renal stones.
    Sen H; Seckiner I; Bayrak O; Dogan K; Erturhan S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Dec; 13(6):619.e1-619.e5. PubMed ID: 28679474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.