577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26211882)
1. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.
Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Humaidan P; Coetzee K
Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):899-907.e3. PubMed ID: 26211882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are perinatal outcomes affected by blastocyst vitrification and warming?
Barsky M; St Marie P; Rahil T; Markenson GR; Sites CK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):603.e1-603.e5. PubMed ID: 27287684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is large for gestational age in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer associated with freezing technique or endometrial preparation protocol? A longitudinal national French study.
Hesters L; Sermondade N; Lambert C; Pouly JL; Pereira B; Lucas C; Levy R; Brugnon F;
Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):724-732. PubMed ID: 38384249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group.
Ginström Ernstad E; Spangmose AL; Opdahl S; Henningsen AA; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Gissler M; Wennerholm UB; Pinborg A; Bergh C; Malchau SS
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2282-2289. PubMed ID: 31687765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.
Pereira N; Petrini AC; Lekovich JP; Schattman GL; Rosenwaks Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 27388034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer.
Belva F; Bonduelle M; Roelants M; Verheyen G; Van Landuyt L
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1610-20. PubMed ID: 27165622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.
Shi W; Xue X; Zhang S; Zhao W; Liu S; Zhou H; Wang M; Shi J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1338-42. PubMed ID: 22464083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.
Devine K; Connell MT; Richter KS; Ramirez CI; Levens ED; DeCherney AH; Stillman RJ; Widra EA
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1454-60.e1. PubMed ID: 25813283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching.
Park DS; Kim JW; Chang EM; Lee WS; Yoon TK; Lyu SW
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():499. PubMed ID: 32849288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles.
De Vos A; Santos-Ribeiro S; Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29206936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis.
Gu F; Li S; Zheng L; Gu J; Li T; Du H; Gao C; Ding C; Quan S; Zhou C; Li P; Xu Y
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1788-1798. PubMed ID: 31407797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes.
Rafael F; Robles GM; Navarro AT; Garrido N; Garcia-Velasco JA; Bosch E; Nunes SG; Soares SR; Santos-Ribeiro S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 37(7):1642-1651. PubMed ID: 35451027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blastocyst vitrification, cryostorage and warming does not affect live birth rate, infant birth weight or timing of delivery.
Sekhon L; Lee JA; Flisser E; Copperman AB; Stein D
Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Jul; 37(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29706285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study.
Holden EC; Kashani BN; Morelli SS; Alderson D; Jindal SK; Ohman-Strickland PA; McGovern PG
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul; 110(1):89-94.e2. PubMed ID: 29908769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
