305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26211939)
1. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.
Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Cahill A; Gaya DR; Thompson E; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Benson G; Murray W
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 34(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21707681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation.
Stanley AJ; Ashley D; Dalton HR; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Thompson E; Warshow U; Groome M; Cahill A; Benson G; Blatchford O; Murray W
Lancet; 2009 Jan; 373(9657):42-7. PubMed ID: 19091393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Custovic N; Husic-Selimovic A; Srsen N; Prohic D
Med Arch; 2020 Aug; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.
Custódio Lima J; Garcia Montes C; Kibune Nagasako C; Soares Ruppert Reis GF; Meirelles Dos Santos JO; Guerrazzi F; Mesquita MA
Digestion; 2013; 88(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 24335273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Glasgow Blatchford score is the most accurate assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Laursen SB; Hansen JM; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Oct; 10(10):1130-1135.e1. PubMed ID: 22801061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
