142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26211982)
1. [A genetic ID for tomorrow?].
Perbal L
C R Biol; 2015; 338(8-9):547-53. PubMed ID: 26211982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: ethical and regulatory issues that arise from wanting to 'know' your DNA.
Samuel GN; Jordens CF; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2010 Mar; 40(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20446967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility: a premature commercialisation of doubtful validity and value.
Mathews R; Hall W; Carter A
Addiction; 2012 Dec; 107(12):2069-74. PubMed ID: 22510165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Savard J; Mooney-Somers J; Newson AJ; Kerridge I
Intern Med J; 2014 Jan; 44(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24450520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
Caulfield T; Ries NM; Ray PN; Shuman C; Wilson B
Clin Genet; 2010 Feb; 77(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19968666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Privacy and the Human Genome Project.
Wiesenthal DL; Wiener NI
Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 11654975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The human genome project: exploring its progress and successes and the ethical, legal, and social implications.
Zneimer SM
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 12046269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues.
Wasson K; Cook ED; Helzlsouer K
Ethics Med; 2006; 22(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 17115513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research 2.0: social networking and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics.
Lee SS; Crawley L
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):35-44. PubMed ID: 19998112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Personal genomes: no bad news?
Chadwick R
Bioethics; 2011 Feb; 25(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 21175708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent.
Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):343-51. PubMed ID: 23137034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personal genome sequencing: the answer to all of our worries.
Nelkin D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(1):9. PubMed ID: 12613377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical issues concerning genetic testing and screening in public health.
Hodge JG
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2004 Feb; 125C(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 14755435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing for age-related macular degeneration.
Buitendijk GH; Amin N; Hofman A; van Duijn CM; Vingerling JR; Klaver CC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Aug; 55(10):6167-74. PubMed ID: 25146986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic testing: ethical implications in the workplace.
McCunney RJ
Occup Med; 2002; 17(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 12225935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy preserving processing of genomic data: A survey.
Akgün M; Bayrak AO; Ozer B; Sağıroğlu MŞ
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Aug; 56():103-11. PubMed ID: 26056074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic information and property theory.
Barrad CM
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 87(3):1037-86. PubMed ID: 11656395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some ethical implications of the Human Genome Project.
Epstein CJ
Genet Med; 2000; 2(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 11256665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-genome sequencing and the physician.
Thorogood A; Knoppers BM; Dondorp WJ; de Wert GM
Clin Genet; 2012 Jun; 81(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 22404433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review.
Sanfilippo PG; Kearns LS; Wright P; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 43(6):578-90. PubMed ID: 25676199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
