These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26212887)

  • 1. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different numbers of mini-dental implants on alveolar ridge strain distribution under mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
    Warin P; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Khongkhunthian P
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants.
    Solberg K; Heinemann F; Pellikaan P; Keilig L; Stark H; Bourauel C; Hasan I
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):770-782. PubMed ID: 28279083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
    Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
    Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Khurana N; Rodrigues S; Shenoy S; Saldanha S; Pai U; Shetty T; N S; Mahesh M; Hegde P
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e795-e805. PubMed ID: 30191668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures in Complete Cleft Palate Models: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Soğancı G; Yazıcıoğlu H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 24919124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis.
    Arat Bilhan S; Baykasoglu C; Bilhan H; Kutay O; Mugan A
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 25443880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.