85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26213189)
1. Static and dynamic compression application and removal on the intervertebral discs of growing rats.
Ménard AL; Grimard G; Massol E; Londono I; Moldovan F; Villemure I
J Orthop Res; 2016 Feb; 34(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 26213189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in nuclear composition following cyclic compression of the intervertebral disc in an in vivo rat-tail model.
Ching CT; Chow DH; Yao FY; Holmes AD
Med Eng Phys; 2004 Sep; 26(7):587-94. PubMed ID: 15271286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone growth resumption following in vivo static and dynamic compression removals on rats.
Ménard AL; Grimard G; Londono I; Beaudry F; Vachon P; Moldovan F; Villemure I
Bone; 2015 Dec; 81():662-668. PubMed ID: 26416149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo remodeling of intervertebral discs in response to short- and long-term dynamic compression.
Wuertz K; Godburn K; MacLean JJ; Barbir A; Donnelly JS; Roughley PJ; Alini M; Iatridis JC
J Orthop Res; 2009 Sep; 27(9):1235-42. PubMed ID: 19274755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro.
Wang DL; Jiang SD; Dai LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2521-8. PubMed ID: 17978649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of an in vitro intervertebral disc organ culture system.
Korecki CL; MacLean JJ; Iatridis JC
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 17629763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro.
Masuoka K; Michalek AJ; MacLean JJ; Stokes IA; Iatridis JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1974-9. PubMed ID: 17700443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading.
Walsh AJ; Lotz JC
J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 14757452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Static Load on the Nucleus Pulposus of Rabbit Intervertebral Disc Motion Segment in Ex vivo Organ Culture.
Zhu LG; Feng MS; Zhan JW; Zhang P; Yu J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(19):2338-46. PubMed ID: 27647194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of static compression with different loading magnitudes and durations on the intervertebral disc: an in vivo rat-tail study.
Lai A; Chow DH; Siu SW; Leung SS; Lau EF; Tang FH; Pope MH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(25):2721-7. PubMed ID: 19050577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nucleus pulposus cell response to confined and unconfined compression implicates mechanoregulation by fluid shear stress.
Wang P; Yang L; Hsieh AH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Mar; 39(3):1101-11. PubMed ID: 21132369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compression-induced changes in intervertebral disc properties in a rat tail model.
Iatridis JC; Mente PL; Stokes IA; Aronsson DD; Alini M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):996-1002. PubMed ID: 10332792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic compression effects on intervertebral disc mechanics and biology.
Korecki CL; MacLean JJ; Iatridis JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1403-9. PubMed ID: 18520935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo dynamic loading reduces bone growth without histomorphometric changes of the growth plate.
Ménard AL; Grimard G; Valteau B; Londono I; Moldovan F; Villemure I
J Orthop Res; 2014 Sep; 32(9):1129-36. PubMed ID: 24902946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of cyclic compression on the mechanical properties of the inter-vertebral disc: an in vivo study in a rat tail model.
Ching CT; Chow DH; Yao FY; Holmes AD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Mar; 18(3):182-9. PubMed ID: 12620780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dynamic observation on imbalance of dynamic and static forces and degenerated cervical intervertebral disc in rats].
Wang YJ; Shi Q; Shen PZ
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2001 Mar; 21(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 12577338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression.
Maclean JJ; Lee CR; Alini M; Iatridis JC
J Orthop Res; 2004 Nov; 22(6):1193-200. PubMed ID: 15475197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intervertebral disc recovery after dynamic or static loading in vitro: is there a role for the endplate?
van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; Nadort A; Stam B; Smit TH
J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2230-5. PubMed ID: 17182043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static versus dynamic loading in the mechanical modulation of vertebral growth.
Akyuz E; Braun JT; Brown NA; Bachus KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E952-8. PubMed ID: 17139211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical disc culture system: feasibility study using rat intervertebral discs.
Ramakrishnan PS; Hong J; Martin JA; Kurriger GL; Buckwalter JA; Lim TH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):611-20. PubMed ID: 22034744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
