128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26213433)
1. Comparison of first pass bolus AIFs extracted from sequential
Evans E; Sawiak SJ; Ward AO; Buonincontri G; Hawkes RC; Carpenter TA
Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2014 Jan; 734(B):137-140. PubMed ID: 26213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A PET-Guided Framework Supports a Multiple Arterial Input Functions Approach in DSC-MRI in Acute Stroke.
Livne M; Madai VI; Brunecker P; Zaro-Weber O; Moeller-Hartmann W; Heiss WD; Mouridsen K; Sobesky J
J Neuroimaging; 2017 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28207200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinetic quantitation of cerebral PET-FDG studies without concurrent blood sampling: statistical recovery of the arterial input function.
O'Sullivan F; Kirrane J; Muzi M; O'Sullivan JN; Spence AM; Mankoff DA; Krohn KA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):610-24. PubMed ID: 19709971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conversion of arterial input functions for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and 18F-FDG/PET.
Poulin E; Lebel R; Croteau E; Blanchette M; Tremblay L; Lecomte R; Bentourkia M; Lepage M
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Mar; 69(3):781-92. PubMed ID: 22570280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning derived input-function in a dynamic
Kuttner S; Wickstrøm KK; Kalda G; Dorraji SE; Martin-Armas M; Oteiza A; Jenssen R; Fenton K; Sundset R; Axelsson J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015020. PubMed ID: 33438608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of the reference region method for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and (18) F-FDG/PET.
Poulin É; Lebel R; Croteau É; Blanchette M; Tremblay L; Lecomte R; Bentourkia M; Lepage M
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):740-8. PubMed ID: 24604379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/MRI of the brain: Automated MR-driven calculation of an image-derived input function for the non-invasive determination of cerebral glucose metabolic rates.
Sundar LK; Muzik O; Rischka L; Hahn A; Rausch I; Lanzenberger R; Hienert M; Klebermass EM; Füchsel FG; Hacker M; Pilz M; Pataraia E; Traub-Weidinger T; Beyer T
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1516-1530. PubMed ID: 29790820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arterial input function and gray matter cerebral blood volume measurements in children.
Withey SB; Novak J; MacPherson L; Peet AC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):981-9. PubMed ID: 26514288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive kinetic modelling of PET tracers with radiometabolites using a constrained simultaneous estimation method: evaluation with
Sari H; Erlandsson K; Marner L; Law I; Larsson HBW; Thielemans K; Ourselin S; Arridge S; Atkinson D; Hutton BF
EJNMMI Res; 2018 Jul; 8(1):58. PubMed ID: 29971517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice.
Evans E; Buonincontri G; Izquierdo D; Methner C; Hawkes RC; Ansorge RE; Krieg T; Carpenter TA; Sawiak SJ
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2015 Jun; 62(3 Pt 1):628-633. PubMed ID: 26213413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-derived arterial input function in dynamic positron emission tomography-computed tomography: a method using both positron emission tomographic and computed tomographic images.
Feng ST; Cui M; Gao J; Wu B; Sha W; Huang B
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 23192217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic arterial input function selection in CT and MR perfusion datasets using deep convolutional neural networks.
Winder A; d'Esterre CD; Menon BK; Fiehler J; Forkert ND
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4199-4211. PubMed ID: 32583617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated extraction of the arterial input function from brain images for parametric PET studies.
Moradi H; Vashistha R; Ghosh S; O'Brien K; Hammond A; Rominger A; Sari H; Shi K; Vegh V; Reutens D
EJNMMI Res; 2024 Apr; 14(1):33. PubMed ID: 38558200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of signal formation in local arterial input function measurements of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Bleeker EJ; Webb AG; van Walderveen MA; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
Magn Reson Med; 2012 May; 67(5):1324-31. PubMed ID: 22190258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals.
Enmi J; Kudomi N; Hayashi T; Yamamoto A; Iguchi S; Moriguchi T; Hori Y; Koshino K; Zeniya T; Jon Shah N; Yamada N; Iida H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):7873-92. PubMed ID: 23151851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of errors associated with single- and multi-bolus injection protocols in low-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced tracer kinetic analysis.
Roberts C; Buckley DL; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):611-9. PubMed ID: 16858671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer.
Onxley JD; Yoo DS; Muradyan N; MacFall JR; Brizel DM; Craciunescu OI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 24929169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
