These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26213528)

  • 1. Accelerometry-based Recognition of the Placement Sites of a Wearable Sensor.
    Mannini A; Sabatini AM; Intille SS
    Pervasive Mob Comput; 2015 Aug; 21():62-74. PubMed ID: 26213528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Older Adults: Validation Study.
    Davoudi A; Mardini MT; Nelson D; Albinali F; Ranka S; Rashidi P; Manini TM
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23681. PubMed ID: 33938809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting Sleep and Nonwear in 24-h Wrist Accelerometer Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Thapa-Chhetry B; Arguello DJ; John D; Intille S
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2022 Nov; 54(11):1936-1946. PubMed ID: 36007161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle.
    Mannini A; Intille SS; Rosenberger M; Sabatini AM; Haskell W
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Nov; 45(11):2193-203. PubMed ID: 23604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
    Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of de-shape synchrosqueezing to estimate gait cadence from a single-sensor accelerometer placed in different body locations.
    Wu HT; Harezlak J
    Physiol Meas; 2023 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 37080236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posture and Physical Activity Detection: Impact of Number of Sensors and Feature Type.
    Tang QU; John D; Thapa-Chhetry B; Arguello DJ; Intille S
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 Aug; 52(8):1834-1845. PubMed ID: 32079910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activity Recognition Invariant to Sensor Orientation with Wearable Motion Sensors.
    Yurtman A; Barshan B
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Aug; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 28792481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors.
    Shoaib M; Bosch S; Incel OD; Scholten H; Havinga PJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Mar; 16(4):426. PubMed ID: 27023543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time.
    Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Bakrania K; Stanley RM; Parfitt G; Eston RG; Yates T; Fraysse F
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Apr; 20(4):368-372. PubMed ID: 28117147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of simple heuristic features in sensor orientation and placement problems in human activity recognition using a single smartphone accelerometer.
    Barua A; Jiang X; Fuller D
    Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Feb; 23(1):21. PubMed ID: 38368358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems.
    Gao L; Bourke AK; Nelson J
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 24636448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.
    Attal F; Mohammed S; Dedabrishvili M; Chamroukhi F; Oukhellou L; Amirat Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31314-38. PubMed ID: 26690450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
    Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.
    Kerr J; Marinac CR; Ellis K; Godbole S; Hipp A; Glanz K; Mitchell J; Laden F; James P; Berrigan D
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Mar; 49(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 27755355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression Model-Based Walking Speed Estimation Using Wrist-Worn Inertial Sensor.
    Zihajehzadeh S; Park EJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165211. PubMed ID: 27764231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of an accelerometer for measurement of activity in frail older people.
    Chigateri NG; Kerse N; Wheeler L; MacDonald B; Klenk J
    Gait Posture; 2018 Oct; 66():114-117. PubMed ID: 30172217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can we use accelerometry to monitor balance exercise performance in older adults?
    Tung JY; Ng H; Moore C; Giangregorio L
    Gait Posture; 2014 Mar; 39(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 24360637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The application of EMD in activity recognition based on a single triaxial accelerometer.
    Liao M; Guo Y; Qin Y; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1533-9. PubMed ID: 26405917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.