These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26214093)

  • 21. Validation of a new disposable counting chamber.
    Coetzee K; Menkveld R
    Arch Androl; 2001; 47(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11554687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer.
    Park MJ; Lim MY; Park HJ; Park NC
    Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Nov; 62(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 34729967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One-step disposable chambers for sperm concentration and motility assessment: how do they compare with the World Health Organization's recommended methods?
    Tomlinson M; Turner J; Powell G; Sakkas D
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):121-124. PubMed ID: 11139549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
    Amann RP; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of counting chamber depth on the accuracy of lensless microscopy for the assessment of boar sperm motility.
    Soler C; Picazo-Bueno JÁ; Micó V; Valverde A; Bompart D; Blasco FJ; Álvarez JG; García-Molina A
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun; 30(6):924-934. PubMed ID: 29724324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal frame rate when there were stallion sperm motility evaluations and determinations for kinematic variables using CASA-Mot analysis in different counting chambers.
    Gacem S; Bompart D; Valverde A; Catalán J; Miró J; Soler C
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2020 Dec; 223():106643. PubMed ID: 33157363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CASA-Mot technology: how results are affected by the frame rate and counting chamber.
    Bompart D; García-Molina A; Valverde A; Caldeira C; Yániz J; Núñez de Murga M; Soler C
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun; 30(6):810-819. PubMed ID: 29614241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer-aided sperm analysis: past, present and future.
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2014 May; 46(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 23550608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a disposable plastic Neubauer counting chamber for semen analysis.
    Kirkman-Brown J; Björndahl L
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):627-31. PubMed ID: 18439603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
    Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
    Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined effects of type and depth of counting chamber, and rate of image frame capture, on bull sperm motility and kinematics.
    Bompart D; Vázquez RF; Gómez R; Valverde A; Roldán ERS; García-Molina A; Soler C
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2019 Oct; 209():106169. PubMed ID: 31514930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.
    Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
    Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers.
    Imade GE; Towobola OA; Sagay AS; Otubu JA
    Arch Androl; 1993; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8373281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Influence of the depth of the sperm counting chamber on sperm motility].
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Sep; 19(9):776-9. PubMed ID: 24386852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration.
    Mahmoud AM; Depoorter B; Piens N; Comhaire FH
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 9240267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.