These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26214233)

  • 1. Evaluating Guidelines: A Review of Key Quality Criteria.
    Semlitsch T; Blank WA; Kopp IB; Siering U; Siebenhofer A
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2015 Jul; 112(27-28):471-8. PubMed ID: 26214233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Development of a workable mini checklist to assess guideline quality].
    Semlitsch T; Jeitler K; Kopp IB; Siebenhofer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):299-312. PubMed ID: 25066349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.
    Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Atkins D; Brozek J; Vist G; Alderson P; Glasziou P; Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 21194891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].
    Simoes E; Boukamp K; Mayer ED; Schmahl FW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Jun; 66(6):370-9. PubMed ID: 15206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].
    Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The NICE process for developing quality standards and indicators.
    Bennett B; Coventry E; Greenway N; Minchin M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):481-6. PubMed ID: 25523846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.
    Wennekes L; Hermens RP; van Heumen K; Runde V; Schoelen H; Wollersheim HC; Grol RP; de Mulder PH; Ottevanger PB
    Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 18455399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality indicators for National Disease Management Guidelines using the example of the National Disease Management Guideline for "Chronic Heart Failure"].
    Nothacker MJ; Langer T; Weinbrenner S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 21382602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy.
    Van der Wees PJ; Hendriks EJ; Custers JW; Burgers JS; Dekker J; de Bie RA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():191. PubMed ID: 18036215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of clinical practice guideline appraisal instruments.
    Graham ID; Calder LA; Hébert PC; Carter AO; Tetroe JM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(4):1024-38. PubMed ID: 11155826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].
    Thole H; Weingart O; Lampert U; Bassler D; Fessler J; Forster J; Franzen D; Geraedts M; Kroegel C; Mörike K; Schmitz M; Scholz R; Teske S; Ollenschläger G;
    Pneumologie; 2003 Aug; 57(8):459-67. PubMed ID: 12928987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of guideline quality using GEM-Q.
    Agrawal A; Shiffman RN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11604898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical guidelines: quality and implementation.
    Mäkelä M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):526-30. PubMed ID: 17137066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative quality assessment of evidence-based clinical guidelines in endocrinology.
    Hazlehurst JM; Armstrong MJ; Sherlock M; Rowe IA; O'Reilly MW; Franklyn JA; Stewart PM; Tomlinson JW
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2013 Feb; 78(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 22624723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Relevance of quality of life as a quality indicator in guideline development].
    Fischer F; Krämer A; Klose K
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 May; 77(5):e119-32. PubMed ID: 25025288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in Saudi Arabia.
    Al-Ansary LA; Alkhenizan A
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1555-8. PubMed ID: 15573177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.
    Hutchinson A; McIntosh A; Anderson J; Gilbert C; Field R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Sep; 53(494):690-6. PubMed ID: 15103876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements.
    Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25660962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 16. Evaluation.
    Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Fretheim A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2006 Dec; 4():28. PubMed ID: 17156460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.