412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26214320)
1. Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Khan NR; Clark AJ; Lee SL; Venable GT; Rossi NB; Foley KT
Neurosurgery; 2015 Dec; 77(6):847-74; discussion 874. PubMed ID: 26214320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open Transforaminal lumbar Interbody fusion in obese patients: a meta-analysis.
Xie Q; Zhang J; Lu F; Wu H; Chen Z; Jian F
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):15. PubMed ID: 29343248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Phan K; Rao PJ; Kam AC; Mobbs RJ
Eur Spine J; 2015 May; 24(5):1017-30. PubMed ID: 25813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
Li A; Li X; Zhong Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30236132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kulkarni AG; Bohra H; Dhruv A; Sarraf A; Bassi A; Patil VM
Indian J Orthop; 2016 Sep; 50(5):464-472. PubMed ID: 27746487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
Chen YC; Zhang L; Li EN; Ding LX; Zhang GA; Hou Y; Yuan W
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(43):e17420. PubMed ID: 31651845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.
Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. One-level open vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and advanced meta-analytic assessment of prospective studies with at least two years follow-up.
Kunadt M; Barleben L; Büttner-Janz K
Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 35699832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
