BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26214320)

  • 21. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.
    Lin GX; Akbary K; Kotheeranurak V; Quillo-Olvera J; Jo HJ; Yang XW; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e898-e909. PubMed ID: 30099187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Xie L; Wu WJ; Liang Y
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Aug; 129(16):1969-86. PubMed ID: 27503024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sousa JM; Ribeiro H; Silva JL; Nogueira P; Consciência JG
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2101. PubMed ID: 35136081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.
    Hammad A; Wirries A; Ardeshiri A; Nikiforov O; Geiger F
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jul; 14(1):229. PubMed ID: 31331364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.
    Jover-Mendiola AD; Lopez-Prats FA; Lizaur-Utrilla A; Vizcaya-Moreno MF
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 37008969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
    Lee KH; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Yue WM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):E234-40. PubMed ID: 24513660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
    Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Zhu HF; Fang XQ; Zhao FD; Zhang JF; Zhao X; Hu ZJ; Fan SW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Mar; 47(6):E233-E242. PubMed ID: 34855704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-assisted, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One surgeon's learning curve A STROBE-compliant article.
    Xu YF; Le XF; Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Zhang GL; Liu YJ; Yuan Q; He D; Mao JP; Xiao B; Lang Z; Han XG; Jin PH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11423. PubMed ID: 29979443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Miller LE; Bhattacharyya S; Pracyk J
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():358-365.e4. PubMed ID: 31476471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
    Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e627-e638. PubMed ID: 31108079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes.
    Lin Y; Chen W; Chen A; Li F
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 26091113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse KW; Alluri RK; Vaishnav AS; Urakawa H; Mok JK; Virk SS; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 34699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Haibier A; Yusufu A; Hang L; Abudurexiti T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):92. PubMed ID: 38281015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.