BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26214691)

  • 1. Optimization of Causative Factors for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Using Remote Sensing and GIS Data in Parts of Niigata, Japan.
    Dou J; Tien Bui D; Yunus AP; Jia K; Song X; Revhaug I; Xia H; Zhu Z
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133262. PubMed ID: 26214691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).
    Wang Y; Sun D; Wen H; Zhang H; Zhang F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32545618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring machine learning and statistical approach techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping in Siwalik Himalayan Region using geospatial technology.
    Saha A; Tripathi L; Villuri VGK; Bhardwaj A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(7):10443-10459. PubMed ID: 38198087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.
    Wang Y; Wu X; Chen Z; Ren F; Feng L; Du Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30696105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture.
    Li Y; Deng X; Ji P; Yang Y; Jiang W; Zhao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan.
    Dou J; Yunus AP; Tien Bui D; Merghadi A; Sahana M; Zhu Z; Chen CW; Khosravi K; Yang Y; Pham BT
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 662():332-346. PubMed ID: 30690368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing probabilistic and statistical methods in landslide susceptibility modeling in Rwanda/Centre-Eastern Africa.
    Nsengiyumva JB; Luo G; Amanambu AC; Mind'je R; Habiyaremye G; Karamage F; Ochege FU; Mupenzi C
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 659():1457-1472. PubMed ID: 31096356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convolutional neural network (CNN) with metaheuristic optimization algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping in Icheon, South Korea.
    Hakim WL; Rezaie F; Nur AS; Panahi M; Khosravi K; Lee CW; Lee S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 305():114367. PubMed ID: 34968941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landslide susceptibility assessment and validation in the framework of municipal planning in Portugal: the case of Loures Municipality.
    Guillard C; Zezere J
    Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):721-35. PubMed ID: 22864551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Landslide-Risk Prediction Using Web GIS and Machine Learning Models.
    Tengtrairat N; Woo WL; Parathai P; Aryupong C; Jitsangiam P; Rinchumphu D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34283153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landslide susceptibility assessment using the Weight of Evidence method: A case study in Xunyang area, China.
    Cao Y; Wei X; Fan W; Nan Y; Xiong W; Zhang S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245668. PubMed ID: 33493200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GIS-based data-driven bivariate statistical models for landslide susceptibility prediction in Upper Tista Basin, India.
    Das J; Saha P; Mitra R; Alam A; Kamruzzaman M
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16186. PubMed ID: 37234665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using heuristic and bivariate statistical methods for Iva Valley and environs Southeast Nigeria.
    Ozioko OH; Igwe O
    Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jan; 192(2):119. PubMed ID: 31950278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China.
    Chen W; Peng J; Hong H; Shahabi H; Pradhan B; Liu J; Zhu AX; Pei X; Duan Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():1121-1135. PubMed ID: 29898519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model in Rwanda.
    Nsengiyumva JB; Luo G; Nahayo L; Huang X; Cai P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 29385096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of likelihood ratio and logistic regression models to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS.
    Lee S
    Environ Manage; 2004 Aug; 34(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 15559946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Comparing Statistical Index, Index of Entropy, and Weights of Evidence in the Shangnan Area, China.
    Liu J; Duan Z
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Nov; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 33266593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of statistical methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Bostanlik District, Uzbekistan.
    Juliev M; Mergili M; Mondal I; Nurtaev B; Pulatov A; Hübl J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 653():801-814. PubMed ID: 30759606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey).
    Karsli F; Atasoy M; Yalcin A; Reis S; Demir O; Gokceoglu C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Sep; 156(1-4):241-55. PubMed ID: 18780152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating stratified best-worst method and GIS for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study in Erzurum province (Turkey).
    Konurhan Z; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(53):113978-114000. PubMed ID: 37858024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.