These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26215038)

  • 1. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients.
    Barke A; Riecke J; Rief W; Glombiewski JA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jul; 16():171. PubMed ID: 26215038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS)--statistical properties and model fit of an instrument to assess change processes in pain related disability.
    Wicksell RK; Lekander M; Sorjonen K; Olsson GL
    Eur J Pain; 2010 Aug; 14(7):771.e1-14. PubMed ID: 20106685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical evidence of the validity of the Spanish version of the pain vigilance awareness questionnaire.
    Esteve R; Ramírez-Maestre C; López-Martínez AE
    Int J Behav Med; 2013 Mar; 20(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 22205550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 in an Australian pain clinic sample.
    Baranoff J; Hanrahan SJ; Kapur D; Connor JP
    Int J Behav Med; 2014 Feb; 21(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 23179676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a Spanish version of the psychological inflexibility in pain scale (PIPS) and an evaluation of its relation with acceptance of pain and mindfulness in sample of persons with fibromyalgia.
    Rodero B; Pereira JP; Pérez-Yus MC; Casanueva B; Serrano-Blanco A; Rodrigues da Cunha Ribeiro MJ; Luciano JV; Garcia-Campayo J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Apr; 11():62. PubMed ID: 23594367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain.
    Monticone M; Ferrante S; Rocca B; Nava T; Parini C; Cerri C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E824-31. PubMed ID: 23524871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity.
    Monticone M; Ambrosini E; Rocca B; Nava T; Terragni E; Cerri C; McCracken LM
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Apr; 23(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 26362465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ).
    Ojala T; Piirainen A; Sipilä K; Suutama T; Häkkinen A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 35(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 22726109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Willing and able: a closer look at pain Willingness and Activity Engagement on the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8).
    Fish RA; Hogan MJ; Morrison TG; Stewart I; McGuire BE
    J Pain; 2013 Mar; 14(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 23452647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in a sample of patients with chronic pain.
    Al-Arfaj SK; Abdallah AF; Abdulla FA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Oct; 46(21):5087-5098. PubMed ID: 38100318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.
    Seydi M; Akhbari B; Abdollahi I; Karimi Ghasem Abad S; Biglarian A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Jan; 44(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 33248748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)-further validation including a confirmatory factor analysis and a comparison with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.
    Wicksell RK; Olsson GL; Melin L
    Eur J Pain; 2009 Aug; 13(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 18926744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric properties of the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) in a Swedish chronic pain cohort.
    Rovner GS; Arestedt K; Gerdle B; Börsbo B; McCracken LM
    J Rehabil Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24036958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale: Greek adaptation, psychometric properties, and invariance testing across three pain samples.
    Vasiliou VS; Michaelides MP; Kasinopoulos O; Karekla M
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Jul; 31(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 30896210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.
    Monticone M; Ferrante S; Ferrari S; Foti C; Mugnai R; Pillastrini P; Rocca B; Vanti C
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Aug; 23(6):1789-95. PubMed ID: 24414119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS): Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version for Chronic Low Back Pain and Knee Pain.
    Nagasawa Y; Shibata A; Fukamachi H; Ishii K; Wicksell RK; Oka K
    J Pain Res; 2021; 14():325-332. PubMed ID: 33568939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construct validity of the G-CPAQ and its mediating role in pain interference and adjustment.
    Vasiliou VS; Karekla M; Michaelides MP; Kasinopoulos O
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 28368172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8 - validation and reliability studies.
    Eide H; Leren L; Sørebø Ø
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 39(14):1441-1448. PubMed ID: 27375090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Is the Most Useful Questionnaire for Measurement of Coping Strategies in Response to Nociception?
    Kortlever JT; Janssen SJ; van Berckel MM; Ring D; Vranceanu AM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26105152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adolescent acceptance of pain: confirmatory factor analysis and further validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire, adolescent version.
    Wallace DP; Harbeck-Weber C; Whiteside SP; Harrison TE
    J Pain; 2011 May; 12(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 21429810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.