These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26215291)

  • 1. Remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a meta-analysis.
    Wu Y; Li KL; Zheng J; Zhang CY; Liu XY; Cui ZM; Yu ZM; Wang RX; Wang W
    Neth Heart J; 2015 Sep; 23(10):485-490. PubMed ID: 26215291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Turagam MK; Atkins D; Tung R; Mansour M; Ruskin J; Cheng J; Di Biase L; Natale A; Lakkireddy D
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 49(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 28624892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.
    Blandino A; Bianchi F; Sibona Masi A; Mazzanti A; D'Ascenzo F; Grossi S; Musumeci G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):1102-1114. PubMed ID: 33825206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote magnetic navigation compared to contemporary manual techniques for the catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.
    Bennett RG; Campbell T; Sood A; Bhaskaran A; De Silva K; Davis L; Qian P; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper MJ; Chow CK; Thiagalingam A; Denniss AR; Thomas SP; Kizana E; Kumar S
    Heliyon; 2021 Dec; 7(12):e08538. PubMed ID: 34917813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual control navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jia K; Jin Q; Liu A; Wu L
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 55():78-86. PubMed ID: 31152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote magnetic with open-irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Proietti R; Pecoraro V; Di Biase L; Natale A; Santangeli P; Viecca M; Sagone A; Galli A; Moja L; Tagliabue L
    Europace; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 23585253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    Qian P; De Silva K; Kumar S; Nadri F; Samanta R; Bhaskaran A; Ross D; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper M; Kizana E; Davis L; Denniss AR; Thiagalingam A; Thomas S; Kovoor P
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study.
    Dinov B; Schönbauer R; Wojdyla-Hordynska A; Braunschweig F; Richter S; Altmann D; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Rolf S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G; Arya A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 22313170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote magnetic navigation facilitates the ablations of frequent ventricular premature complexes originating from the outflow tract and the valve annulus as compared to manual control navigation.
    Qiu X; Zhang N; Luo Q; Liu A; Ji Y; Ye J; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Zhao J; Jin Q; Wu L
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 267():94-99. PubMed ID: 29957265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study.
    Shauer A; De Vries LJ; Akca F; Palazzolo J; Shurrab M; Lashevsky I; Tiong I; Singh SM; Newman D; Szili-Torok T; Crystal E
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii28-ii32. PubMed ID: 29722855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shurrab M; Danon A; Crystal A; Arouny B; Tiong I; Lashevsky I; Newman D; Crystal E
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2013 Jul; 11(7):829-36. PubMed ID: 23895026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial).
    Reents T; Jilek C; Schuster P; Nölker G; Koch-Büttner K; Ammar-Busch S; Semmler V; Bourier F; Kottmaier M; Kornmayer M; Brooks S; Fichtner S; Kolb C; Deisenhofer I; Hessling G
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 106(12):947-952. PubMed ID: 28849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method.
    Ghadban R; Gifft K; Luebbering Z; Sodhi S; Cooper D; Enezate T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 62(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32959178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catheter Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia With Remote Magnetic Navigation: STOP-VT Multicenter Trial.
    Skoda J; Arya A; Garcia F; Gerstenfeld E; Marchlinski F; Hindricks G; Miller J; Petru J; Sediva L; Sha Q; Janotka M; Chovanec M; Waldauf P; Neuzil P; Reddy VY
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S29-37. PubMed ID: 26969220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact feedback improves 1-year outcomes of remote magnetic navigation-guided ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Noten AME; Hendriks AA; Yap SC; Mol D; Bhagwandien R; Wijchers S; Kardys I; Khan M; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 315():36-44. PubMed ID: 32413467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote magnetic navigation shows superior long-term outcomes in pediatric atrioventricular (nodal) tachycardia ablation compared to manual radiofrequency and cryoablation.
    Noten AME; Kammeraad JAE; Ramdat Misier NL; Wijchers S; van Beynum IM; Dalinghaus M; Krasemann TB; Yap SC; de Groot NMS; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2021 Dec; 37():100881. PubMed ID: 34646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote magnetic catheter navigation versus conventional ablation in atrial fibrillation ablation: Fluoroscopy reduction.
    Lim PCY; Toh JJH; Loh JKXY; Lee ECY; Chong DTT; Tan BY; Ho KL; Ching CK; Teo WS
    J Arrhythm; 2017 Jun; 33(3):167-171. PubMed ID: 28607610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The First Evaluation of Remote Magnetic Navigation-Guided Pediatric Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation.
    Noten AME; Ramdat Misier NL; Kammeraad JAE; Wijchers S; Van Beynum IM; Dalinghaus M; Krasemann TB; Yap SC; de Groot NMS; Szili-Torok T
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 43(8):1695-1703. PubMed ID: 35486130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.