425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26216289)
1. A system for tumor heterogeneity evaluation and diagnosis based on tumor markers measured routinely in the laboratory.
Hui L; Rixv L; Xiuying Z
Clin Biochem; 2015 Dec; 48(18):1241-5. PubMed ID: 26216289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reference intervals for CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CA72-4, AFP, CEA, NSE and CYFRA21-1.
Yang J; Tang A; Ma J; Sun X; Ming L
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019; 79(1-2):71-74. PubMed ID: 30727773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of LOCI™-based tumor marker assays for tumor markers CA 15-3, CA 125, CEA, CA 19-9 and AFP in gynecological cancers.
Dolscheid-Pommerich RC; Keyver-Paik M; Hecking T; Kuhn W; Hartmann G; Stoffel-Wagner B; Holdenrieder S
Tumour Biol; 2017 Oct; 39(10):1010428317730246. PubMed ID: 29034816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CYFRA 21-1 as a tool for distant metastasis detection in lung cancer.
Cabrera-Alarcon JL; Carrillo-Vico A; Santotoribio JD; Leon-Justel A; Sanchez-Gil R; Gonzalez-Castro A; Guerrero JM
Clin Lab; 2011; 57(11-12):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22239035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prognostic values of CA125, CA19.9, NSE, AND SCC for stage I NSCLC are limited.
Ma S; Shen L; Qian N; Chen K
Cancer Biomark; 2011-2012; 10(3-4):155-62. PubMed ID: 22674301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying the Best Marker Combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for Lung Cancer Screening by Combining ROC Curve and Logistic Regression Analyses: Is It Feasible?
Yang Q; Zhang P; Wu R; Lu K; Zhou H
Dis Markers; 2018; 2018():2082840. PubMed ID: 30364165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary evaluation of clinical utility of CYFRA 21-1, CA 72-4, NSE, CA19-9 and CEA in stomach cancer.
Gwak HK; Lee JH; Park SG
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(12):4933-8. PubMed ID: 24998567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Combination of CA125 and NSE Is Useful for Predicting Liver Metastasis of Lung Cancer.
Wang CF; Peng SJ; Liu RQ; Yu YJ; Ge QM; Liang RB; Li QY; Li B; Shao Y
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():8850873. PubMed ID: 33376560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Wojcik E; Tarapacz J; Rychlik U; Stasik Z; Sas-Korczynska B; Skotnicki P; Kulpa JK
Clin Lab; 2016 Sep; 62(9):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 28164590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of multiple tumor markers's protein chip in the screen program of the elderly].
Yan HY; Zhong RH; Li J; Luo XH; Chen R
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 32(9):924-6. PubMed ID: 22340884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal combination of seven tumour markers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Ando S; Kimura H; Iwai N; Shima M; Ando M; Kuriyama T
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(4B):3085-92. PubMed ID: 11712815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomarkers in the lung cancer diagnosis: a clinical perspective.
Li X; Asmitananda T; Gao L; Gai D; Song Z; Zhang Y; Ren H; Yang T; Chen T; Chen M
Neoplasma; 2012; 59(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 22668014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical observations on the association between diagnosis of lung cancer and serum tumor markers in combination.
Wang WJ; Tao Z; Gu W; Sun LH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(7):4369-71. PubMed ID: 23992005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of a Combined Panel of Six Serum Tumor Markers for Lung Cancer.
Molina R; Marrades RM; Augé JM; Escudero JM; Viñolas N; Reguart N; Ramirez J; Filella X; Molins L; Agustí A
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 193(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 26465739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomarkers along the continuum of care in lung cancer.
Holdenrieder S
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 2016; 245():S40-5. PubMed ID: 27542002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical value of combined detection of serum tumor markers in lung cancer diagnosis].
Chen F; Li WM; Wang DM; Gao SS; Bao Y; Chen WB; Liu D
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Sep; 39(5):832-5. PubMed ID: 19024326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Yang AP; Liu J; Lei HY; Zhang QW; Zhao L; Yang GH
Clin Chim Acta; 2014 Nov; 437():183-6. PubMed ID: 25086284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Cyfra 21-1 and neuron specific enolase in lung cancer diagnosis: a prospective study from China.
Song WA; Liu X; Tian XD; Wang W; Liang CY; Zhang T; Guo JT; Peng YH; Zhou NK
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Oct; 124(20):3244-8. PubMed ID: 22088515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic significance of soluble human leukocyte antigen-G for gastric cancer.
Pan YQ; Ruan YY; Peng JB; Han QY; Zhang X; Lin A; Yan WH
Hum Immunol; 2016 Apr; 77(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 26788811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Levels of Five Tumor Markers (Carcinoembryonic Antigen, CA19-9, Alpha-fetoprotein, CA72-4, and CA125) in Gastric Cancer.
Kim JH; Jun KH; Jung H; Park IS; Chin HM
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 May; 61(131):863-9. PubMed ID: 26176088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
