These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2621739)

  • 21. Telemedicine for antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies with ambulatory and home fetal heart rate monitoring--an update.
    Hod M; Kerner R
    J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12825474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical application of the expert type terminal of remote electronic fetal heart rate home monitoring system].
    Su F; Guo X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 12411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare.
    O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monitoring fetal heart rate by telephone.
    James DK; Robertson PM
    Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1987 Oct; 23(10):444-6. PubMed ID: 3683223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being using the nonstress test.
    Paul RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 6749370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonstress test: dimensions of normal reactivity.
    Devoe LD; McKenzie J; Searle N; Sherline DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):617-20. PubMed ID: 4058819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A controlled trial of self-nonstress test versus assisted nonstress test in the evaluation of fetal well-being.
    Reece EA; Hagay Z; Garofalo J; Hobbins JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 166(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 1536216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
    Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nonstress testing in a physician's office--a five-year experience.
    Hill WC; Alderson M; Henderson T
    West J Med; 1985 Nov; 143(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 4082570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The duration of the outpatient nonstress test (NST) and the diagnosis of fetal reactivity with noncomputerized cardiotocography, A critical review of 1160 tracings].
    Cito G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997; 49(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Percent acceleration time: a new method of fetal assessment.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; Saad S; McKenzie J; Searle N; Davis H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 3945428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of carbon monoxide poisoning on the fetal heart monitor tracing: a report of 3 cases.
    Towers CV; Corcoran VA
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Mar; 54(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 19370905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The cardiotocography instrument test].
    Morgenstern J; Naumann U; Somville T
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 May; 46(5):304-11. PubMed ID: 3721161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Bolnick JM; Garcia G; Fletcher BG; Rayburn WF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 19(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 16854694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Observations on perinatal heart rate monitoring. II. Quantitative unreliability of Doppler fetal heart rate variability.
    Suidan JS; Young BK; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):519-22. PubMed ID: 4032387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A two-channel radiotelemetry system for clinical fetal monitoring.
    Neuman MR; O'Connor E
    Biotelem Patient Monit; 1980; 7(2):104-21. PubMed ID: 7417701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fetal heart rate recorder for long-duration use in active full-term pregnant women.
    Shono H; Muro M; Kohara M; Ito Y; Nagasawa T; Sugimori H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 8290200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.