These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218018)

  • 1. Changes in Lower Facial Height and Facial Esthetics with Incremental Increases in Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Dentate Subjects.
    Orenstein NP; Bidra AS; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Uribe F; Litt MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 26218018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ability of General Dentists and Prosthodontists to Discern and Identify Incremental Increases in Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Dentate Subjects.
    Remiszewski D; Bidra AS; Litt MD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(4):327-333. PubMed ID: 28697201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on lower facial form and perceived facial esthetics: A digital evaluation.
    Sun J; Lin YC; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Oct; 126(4):546-552. PubMed ID: 32981714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on face height.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Ormianer Z; Dvori S; Shifman A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12170849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population. Part 2: Blinded Subjective Analysis.
    Bidra AS; Manzotti A; Wu R
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 28561307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facially generated occlusal vertical dimension.
    Mack MR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Dec; 18(12):1183-6, 1188, 1190 passim; quiz 119. PubMed ID: 9656843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of occlusal vertical dimension on lip positions at smile.
    Chou JC; Thompson GA; Aggarwal HA; Bosio JA; Irelan JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 24836283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Stanisić-Sinobad D; Marković D; Stojanović L
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):535-41. PubMed ID: 18756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population - Part 3: Unblinded and Discriminatory Subjective Analysis.
    Bidra AS; Nguyen V; Manzotti A; Kuo CL
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 28561382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Contribution of three dimensional cephalometry in the study of determining morphological parameters for facial esthetics].
    Zribi A; Faure J
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of increasing vertical dimension of occlusion on facial aesthetics.
    Mohindra NK; Bulman JS
    Br Dent J; 2002 Feb; 192(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 11863155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspective of facial esthetics in dental treatment planning.
    Mack MR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Feb; 75(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 8667276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in Lip Support with and without Labial Flanges in a Maxillary Edentulous Population. Part 4: Patient-Centered Analysis.
    Bidra AS; Touloumi F; Wu R
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 28561383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function.
    Mack MR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):478-85. PubMed ID: 1791557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.