These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218018)

  • 21. Mouth breathing children and cephalometric pattern: does the stage of dental development matter?
    Souki BQ; Lopes PB; Pereira TB; Franco LP; Becker HM; Oliveira DD
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 22425033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.
    Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vertical dimension of the face analyzed by digital photographs.
    Gomes VL; Gonçalves LC; Correia CL; Lucas BL; Carvalho PM
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2008; 3(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19655547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Association of facial sagittal and vertical characteristics with facial aesthetics in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966.
    Krooks L; Pirttiniemi P; Tolvanen M; Kanavakis G; Lähdesmäki R; Silvola AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 30215708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Angular asymmetries of the human face.
    Namano S; Behrend DA; Harcourt JK; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11203607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Beauty judgment: review of the literature].
    Faure J; Bolender Y
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 24685247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The vertical dimension: the high-angle problem.
    Klontz HA
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):336-44. PubMed ID: 17190226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB; Sconzo R; Kinchen JA; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
    Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of Occlusal Vertical Dimension Change in Mechanical and Virtual Articulation: A Pilot Study.
    Lin YC; Scialabba R; Lee JD; Sun J; Lee SJ
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36354657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patterns of vertical facial growth in Korean adolescents analyzed with mixed-effects regression analysis.
    Moon SC; Kim HK; Kwon TK; Han SH; An CH; Park YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 23726331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.