These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218018)

  • 41. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
    Utomi IL
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of occlusal facial height in oral reconstructive procedures.
    L'Estrange PR; Rowell J
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():31-7. PubMed ID: 1300131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index.
    Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
    Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The golden proportion in facial soft-tissues of Vietnamese females.
    Nguyen MS; Saag M; Le VN; Nguyen TT; Nguyen BB; Jagomägi T
    Stomatologija; 2016; 18(3):80-85. PubMed ID: 28386050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The association between dental wear and reduced vertical dimension of the face: a morphologic study on human skulls.
    Levartovsky S; Matalon S; Sarig R; Baruch O; Winocur E
    Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):174-80. PubMed ID: 25455132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative study of the upper and lower vertical facial measurements of the Filipinos as it is used in the Willis method for determining the vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Tina-Olaivar EO; Olaivar OK
    J Philipp Dent Assoc; 1998; 50(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10202517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A proposed linear skeletal distance to predict occlusal vertical dimension: A cephalometric study.
    Alhajj MN; Daer AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):732-735. PubMed ID: 28434682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of the curve of Spee.
    Marshall SD; Caspersen M; Hardinger RR; Franciscus RG; Aquilino SA; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 18774080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perception of Facial Esthetics by Laypersons, Dental Assistants, General Dental Practitioners and Dental Specialists.
    Ms A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 31204322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability. Part II: Facial axis changes and stability.
    Beatrice M; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Nov; 16(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12476496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Facial profile preference among four panels].
    Wang Y; Liao ZY; Lai WL; Yang Z; Zhao ZH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):468-71. PubMed ID: 19087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople.
    Papamanou DA; Gkantidis N; Topouzelis N; Christou P
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 34(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 21771802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Re-evaluation of interarch space determination in fully dentate adults with different facial forms: A clinical study.
    Aradya A; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):613-616. PubMed ID: 29256457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.