These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218055)

  • 1. Recognition Performance of Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations.
    Wilson RH; Hamm HM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 26218055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations on Recognition Performance by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; Sharrett KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 28054913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variables that influence the recognition performance of interrupted words: rise-fall shape and temporal location of the interruptions.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):688-96. PubMed ID: 25365371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 25879238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amplitude (vu and rms) and Temporal (msec) Measures of Two Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 Recordings.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 25879239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.
    Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word recognition with segmented-alternated CVC words: a preliminary report on listeners with normal hearing.
    Wilson RH; Arcos JT; Jones HC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 6482407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.
    Shafiro V; Fogerty D; Smith K; Sheft S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 30458532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.