These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218376)

  • 21. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation.
    Jewell ML; Jewell JL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 20442075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry.
    Mallucci P; Branford OA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1580-3. PubMed ID: 22542729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of botulinum toxin type A on the capsule around a subpectoral implant for breast augmentation.
    Xiao Z
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):782-3. PubMed ID: 19242747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast augmentation with anatomic implants: a method based on the breast implantation base.
    Martin del Yerro JL; Vegas MR; Sanz I; Moreno E; Fernandez V; Puga S; Vecino MG; Biggs TM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 38(2):329-37. PubMed ID: 24002490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Capsular flap: new applications.
    Bogdanov-Berezovsky A; Silberstein E; Shoham Y; Krieger Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):395-7. PubMed ID: 23435509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing the augmented breast: a blinded study comparing round and anatomical form-stable implants.
    Al-Ajam Y; Marsh DJ; Mohan AT; Hamilton S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Mar; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 25805281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic review of single-stage augmentation-mastopexy.
    Khavanin N; Jordan SW; Rambachan A; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Nov; 134(5):922-931. PubMed ID: 25347628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The "triple-plane technique" for breast augmentation.
    Bracaglia R; Gentileschi S; Fortunato R
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 21416299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maximizing Aesthetics and Patient Selection Utilizing Natrelle Inspira Line Implants in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.
    Kortesis BG; Bharti G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):30S-36S. PubMed ID: 31246758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal.
    Gurunluoglu R; Sacak B; Arton J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):304-315. PubMed ID: 23897329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-Surgeon Experience for Maximizing Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Chinese Patients.
    He S; Yin J; Sun J; Huang Q; Liu J; Han C; Yin Z
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Mar; 82(3):269-273. PubMed ID: 30325835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share.
    Noone RB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1820-1827. PubMed ID: 19952638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Use of "Precapsular Space" in Secondary Breast Reconstruction.
    Zingaretti N; De Lorenzi F; Dell'Antonia F; De Biasio F; Riccio M; Parodi PC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):716-23. PubMed ID: 27443324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty.
    Govrin-Yehudain J; Dvir H; Preise D; Govrin-Yehudain O; Govreen-Segal D
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Nov; 35(8):965-71. PubMed ID: 26333989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Five-Year Outcomes of Breast Augmentation with Form-Stable Implants: Periareolar vs Transaxillary.
    Benito-Ruiz J; Manzano ML; Salvador-Miranda L
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Jan; 37(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 27694448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Aesthetic management of the breast after explantation: evaluation and mastopexy options.
    Rohrich RJ; Parker TH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Jul; 120(1):312-315. PubMed ID: 17572580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of 109 Consecutive Explanted Breast Implants: Correlation Between Suspected Implant Rupture and Surgical Findings.
    Maisel Lotan A; Retchkiman M; Tuchman I; Binenboym R; Gronovich Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 27514822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.