These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218377)

  • 1. Discussion: Anatomical and Round Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use.
    Hidalgo DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 26218377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical and Round Breast Implants: How to Select and Indications for Use.
    Hedén P; Montemurro P; Adams WP; Germann G; Scheflan M; Maxwell GP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 26218376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Round gel breast implants or anatomic gel breast implants: which is the best choice?
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Encinas-Brambila J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):743-51. PubMed ID: 19484175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants.
    Caplin DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3 Suppl):27S-37S. PubMed ID: 25158767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discussion: Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
    Hammond DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):823-825. PubMed ID: 24076674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry.
    Mallucci P; Branford OA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1580-3. PubMed ID: 22542729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified round block mastopexy versus traditional round block mastopexy.
    Sterodimas A; Nicaretta B; Boriani F
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015; 19(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 25720702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary to 'primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type'.
    Farhadieh RD
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1173. PubMed ID: 23660279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discussion: Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Augmentation: A Follow-Up of 6 Months.
    Shermak MA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Aug; 154(2):310-311. PubMed ID: 39046838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
    Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on "ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study" and its assigned level of evidence.
    De Lorenzi F; Loschi P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Nov; 35(8):NP269. PubMed ID: 26508653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional simulated images in breast augmentation surgery: an investigation of patients' satisfaction and the correlation between prediction and actual outcome.
    Swanson E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):595e-597e. PubMed ID: 24675214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secondary augmentation-mastopexy: indications, preferred practices, and the treatment of complications.
    Spring MA; Macias LH; Nadeau M; Stevens WG
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Sep; 34(7):1018-40. PubMed ID: 25168806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A single surgeon's experience of the PIP breast implant "saga": indications for surgery and treatment options.
    Malata CM; Cunniffe NG; Blake AM; Patel NG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):e141-5. PubMed ID: 23415722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of breast asymmetries with implants.
    Zayakova Y
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (1):12-7. PubMed ID: 23847805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-stage augmentation-mastopexy with Wise pattern and inverted-T scar.
    Barutcu A; Baytekin C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):784-5. PubMed ID: 19543940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natrelle Style 510 in breast augmentation surgery.
    De Vita R; Buccheri EM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 23084647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation.
    Jewell ML; Jewell JL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 20442075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sientra high-strength cohesive textured round implant technique: roundtable discussion.
    Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Cohen R; Fiorillo MA; Kortesis BG
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35 Suppl 1():S11-21. PubMed ID: 25948655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.