97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218571)
1. Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density.
Skedros JG; Knight AN; Pitts TC; O'Rourke PJ; Burkhead WZ
J Orthop Res; 2016 Feb; 34(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 26218571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultimate fracture load of cadaver proximal humeri correlates more strongly with mean combined cortical thickness than with areal cortical index, DEXA density, or canal-to-calcar ratio.
Skedros JG; Mears CS; Burkhead WZ
Bone Joint Res; 2017 Jan; 6(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28057631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis.
Mather J; MacDermid JC; Faber KJ; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jun; 22(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 23183030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. pQCT bone strength index may serve as a better predictor than bone mineral density for long bone breaking strength.
Siu WS; Qin L; Leung KS
J Bone Miner Metab; 2003; 21(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 12928834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical bone thickness predicts the quantitative bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.
Schmidutz F; Yan SG; Schopf C; Ihle C; Ahrend MD; Sprecher CM
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):33. PubMed ID: 33594610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of bone quality in the proximal humerus by measurement of the contralateral site: a cadaveric analyze.
Diederichs G; Korner J; Goldhahn J; Linke B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Mar; 126(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 16456662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures.
Spross C; Kaestle N; Benninger E; Fornaro J; Erhardt J; Zdravkovic V; Jost B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):3038-45. PubMed ID: 25910780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT.
Perilli E; Briggs AM; Kantor S; Codrington J; Wark JD; Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
Bone; 2012 Jun; 50(6):1416-25. PubMed ID: 22430313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.
Tingart MJ; Apreleva M; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Warner JJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2003 May; 85(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 12793573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Age- and gender-related distribution of bone mineral density and mechanical properties of the proximal humerus].
Lill H; Hepp P; Gowin W; Oestmann JW; Korner J; Haas NP; Josten C; Duda GN
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1544-50. PubMed ID: 12471527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.
Huber MB; Carballido-Gamio J; Bauer JS; Baum T; Eckstein F; Lochmüller EM; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):472-81. PubMed ID: 18430879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to determine the bone mineral density of the distal humerus with radiographic tools?
Clavert P; Javier RM; Charrissoux JL; Obert L; Pidhorz L; Sirveaux F; Mansat P; Fabre T
Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 May; 38(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 26464301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensions and estimated mechanical characteristics of the humerus after long-term tennis loading.
Haapasalo H; Sievanen H; Kannus P; Heinonen A; Oja P; Vuori I
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jun; 11(6):864-72. PubMed ID: 8725185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-Resolution Tomography-Based Quantification of Cortical Porosity and Cortical Thickness at the Surgical Neck of the Humerus During Aging.
Helfen T; Sprecher CM; Eberli U; Gueorguiev B; Müller PE; Richards RG; Schmidutz F
Calcif Tissue Int; 2017 Sep; 101(3):271-279. PubMed ID: 28432379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Humeral BMD can be Measured With DXA and Is Lower in the Surgical Arm After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Andersen L; Krueger D; Bernatz J; Binkley N; Anderson PA; Grogan B
J Clin Densitom; 2022; 25(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 36114106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The difference in spine specimen dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density between in situ and in vitro scans.
Tan JS; Kayanja MM; St Clair SF
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):784-8. PubMed ID: 20381430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.
Finkelstein JS; Cleary RL; Butler JP; Antonelli R; Mitlak BH; Deraska DJ; Zamora-Quezada JC; Neer RM
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1994 Mar; 78(3):724-30. PubMed ID: 8126149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
