These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218619)

  • 1. Comparing a single case to a control group - Applying linear mixed effects models to repeated measures data.
    Huber S; Klein E; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():148-59. PubMed ID: 26218619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-case research in neuropsychology: a comparison of five forms of t-test for comparing a case to controls.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cortex; 2012 Sep; 48(8):1009-16. PubMed ID: 21843884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximizing the power of comparing single cases against a control sample: an argument, a program for making comparisons, and a worked example from the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test.
    Hulleman J; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 May; 24(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 18416492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On comparing a single case with a control sample: an alternative perspective.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Howell DC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2690-5. PubMed ID: 19383506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gauss or Bernoulli? A Monte Carlo comparison of the performance of the linear mixed-model and the logistic mixed-model analyses in simulated community trials with a dichotomous outcome variable at the individual level.
    Hannan PJ; Murray DM
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):338-52. PubMed ID: 10182208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Porter S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 May; 27(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 20936548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariate normative comparisons.
    Huizenga HM; Smeding H; Grasman RP; Schmand B
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(11):2534-42. PubMed ID: 17451757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of single-case experimental count data using the linear mixed effects model: A simulation study.
    Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Fernández-Castilla B; Beretvas SN; Moeyaert M; Ferron JM; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2477-2497. PubMed ID: 30105444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: evaluation of alternatives using monte carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 May; 19(3):318-31. PubMed ID: 15910118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing a single case with a control sample: correction and further comment.
    Corballis MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2696-7. PubMed ID: 19383507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the linear mixed model to analyze nonnormal data distributions in longitudinal designs.
    Arnau J; Bono R; Blanca MJ; Bendayan R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1224-38. PubMed ID: 22399245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing a single case to a control sample: testing for neuropsychological deficits and dissociations in the presence of covariates.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Ryan K
    Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1166-78. PubMed ID: 21458788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of criteria for classical dissociations in single-case studies by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Sep; 19(5):664-78. PubMed ID: 16187885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of testing for a deficit in single-case studies: Evaluation of statistical power by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):877-904. PubMed ID: 21049358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Approaches to Analyzing Continuous Correlated Eye Data When Sample Size Is Small.
    Huang J; Huang J; Chen Y; Ying GS
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 28891730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.