100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218767)
21. Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients.
Symons JL; Huo A; Yuen CL; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Sutherland RL; Brenner P; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2013 Sep; 112(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 23551500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PCA3 sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection in patients with abnormal PSA and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. First Latin American experience.
Ramos CG; Valdevenito R; Vergara I; Anabalon P; Sanchez C; Fulla J
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1522-6. PubMed ID: 22687565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort.
Dall'Era MA; Konety BR; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Stauf F; Cooperberg MR; Meng MV; Kane CJ; Perez N; Master VA; Carroll PR
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(12):2664-70. PubMed ID: 18433013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL.
Bozeman CB; Carver BS; Caldito G; Venable DD; Eastham JA
Urology; 2005 Oct; 66(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 16230142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.
Miele ME
Clin Lab Sci; 2001; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 15625982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms. Cooperative Group for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 9286642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.
Luciani LG; De Giorgi G; Valotto C; Zanin M; Bierti S; Zattoni F
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):555-8. PubMed ID: 16527579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hypoechoic lesions of the prostate: clinical relevance of tumor size, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen.
Lee F; Torp-Pedersen S; Littrup PJ; McLeary RD; McHugh TA; Smid AP; Stella PJ; Borlaza GS
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):29-32. PubMed ID: 2462262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Screening of cancer of the prostate: study in a Spanish population].
Herrero Payo JA; Montes Díaz MJ; Páez Borda A; Sánchez Sánchez E; Moreno Valle JA; Berenguer Sánchez A
Arch Esp Urol; 1996; 49(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 8929102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values.
Nepple KG; Joudi FN; Hillis SL; Wahls TL
Mayo Clin Proc; 2008 Apr; 83(4):439-45. PubMed ID: 18380989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason > or =7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men.
Borden LS; Wright JL; Kim J; Latchamsetty K; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2007 Mar; 99(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 17155976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An evaluation of usefulness of prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in an unscreened population:experience in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Ojewola RW; Tijani KH; Jeje EA; Ogunjimi MA; Anunobi CC; Adesanya AO
West Afr J Med; 2013; 32(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23613288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of malignant prostatic cells detection in blood for early detection of prostate cancer: comparison to prostatic biopsy.
Murray NP; Reyes E; Tapia P; Orellana N; Dueñas R; Fuentealba C; Badinez L
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Dec; 64(10):961-71. PubMed ID: 22228894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treatment of early-stage prostate cancer among rural and urban patients.
Baldwin LM; Andrilla CH; Porter MP; Rosenblatt RA; Patel S; Doescher MP
Cancer; 2013 Aug; 119(16):3067-75. PubMed ID: 23765584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of percent free prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density as methods to enhance prostate specific antigen specificity in early prostate cancer detection in men with normal rectal examination and prostate specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng./ml.
Morote J; Raventós CX; Lorente JA; Lopez-Pacios MA; Encabo G; de Torres I; Andreu J
J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):502-4. PubMed ID: 9224333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital rectal examination as a prostate cancer-screening method in a country with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Shim HB; Lee SE; Park HK; Ku JH
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 17297501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Value of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density in detection of prostate cancer in an Iranian population of men.
Ghafoori M; Varedi P; Hosseini SJ; Asgari M; Shakiba M
Urol J; 2009; 6(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 19711272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution.
Kobayashi T; Kawahara T; Nishizawa K; Ogura K; Mitsumori K; Ide Y
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1245-8. PubMed ID: 15892809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A long follow-up on prostate specific antigen density and prostate biopsy.
Netto Júnior NR; De Lima ML; Lavoura Júnior Nda S; Apuzzo F; De Lucena RG
Arch Esp Urol; 1998 Dec; 51(10):1050-3. PubMed ID: 9951132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early detection of high-grade prostate cancer using digital rectal examination (DRE) in men with a prostate-specific antigen level of <2.5 ng/mL and the risk of death.
Hattangadi JA; Chen MH; D'Amico AV
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1636-41. PubMed ID: 22757982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
