661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218933)
1. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A double-blind, randomized, prospective study of epidural steroid injection vs. the mild® procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Brown LL
Pain Pract; 2012 Jun; 12(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 22272730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM;
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.
Chopko B; Caraway DL
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
Pain Manag; 2022 Mar; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous Epidural Adhesiolysis Using Inflatable Balloon Catheter and Balloon-less Catheter in Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Karm MH; Choi SS; Kim DH; Park JY; Lee S; Park JK; Suh YJ; Leem JG; Shin JW
Pain Physician; 2018 Nov; 21(6):593-606. PubMed ID: 30508987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mild procedure: single-site prospective IRB study.
Basu S
Clin J Pain; 2012; 28(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21926907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.
Deer TR; Costandi SJ; Washabaugh E; Chafin TB; Wahezi SE; Jassal N; Sayed D
Pain Med; 2022 Apr; 23(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 35167700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review to assess comparative effectiveness studies in epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis and to estimate reimbursement amounts.
Bresnahan BW; Rundell SD; Dagadakis MC; Sullivan SD; Jarvik JG; Nguyen H; Friedly JL
PM R; 2013 Aug; 5(8):705-14. PubMed ID: 23953016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Zaina F; Tomkins-Lane C; Carragee E; Negrini S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD010264. PubMed ID: 26824399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of transforaminal balloon treatment in patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.
Kim SH; Choi WJ; Suh JH; Jeon SR; Hwang CJ; Koh WU; Lee C; Leem JG; Lee SC; Shin JW
Pain Physician; 2013; 16(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23703408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Deer TR; Chafin TB; Costandi SJ; Qu H; Kim C; Jassal N; Patel K; Calodney A
Pain Pract; 2024 Jan; 24(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 37661347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
