BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26218981)

  • 1. Probabilistic characterisation of baseline noise in STR profiles.
    Mönich UJ; Duffy K; Médard M; Cadambe V; Alfonse LE; Grgicak C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():107-122. PubMed ID: 26218981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of stutter ratios in short tandem repeat loci typing of low copy number DNA samples.
    Seo SB; Ge J; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 24315611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 21458395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New stutter ratio distribution for DNA mixture interpretation based on a continuous model.
    Manabe S; Hamano Y; Morimoto C; Kawai C; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():16-21. PubMed ID: 26980248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® Direct systems.
    Myers BA; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 22405516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterising the STR locus D6S1043 and examination of its effect on stutter rates.
    Bright JA; Stevenson KE; Coble MD; Hill CR; Curran JM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 24315584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterising stutter in forensic STR multiplexes.
    Brookes C; Bright JA; Harbison S; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 21388903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
    Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling forward stutter: toward increased objectivity in forensic DNA interpretation.
    Bright JA; Buckleton JS; Taylor D; Fernando MA; Curran JM
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3152-7. PubMed ID: 25147083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling PowerPlex® Y stutter and artefacts.
    Bright JA; Curran JM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():126-36. PubMed ID: 24727430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computation of marginal distributions of peak-heights in electropherograms for analysing single source and mixture STR DNA samples.
    Cowell RG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():164-168. PubMed ID: 29793138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mixture interpretation: Experimental and simulated reevaluation of qualitative analysis.
    Manabe S; Mori Y; Kawai C; Ozeki M; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2013 Mar; 15(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 23089142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced low-template DNA analysis conditions and investigation of allele dropout patterns.
    Hedell R; Dufva C; Ansell R; Mostad P; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():61-75. PubMed ID: 25282604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic expert systems for handling artifacts in complex DNA mixtures.
    Cowell RG; Lauritzen SL; Mortera J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 20452303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving DNA data exchange: validation studies on a single 6 dye STR kit with 24 loci.
    Martín P; de Simón LF; Luque G; Farfán MJ; Alonso A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():68-78. PubMed ID: 25082138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis of allelic drop-out at short tandem repeat loci].
    Chen WJ; Li Y; Wu XJ; Zhang YM; Liu SJ; Chen Y; Chen WH; Sun HY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 29(3):360-3. PubMed ID: 22678808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR amplification kit for forensic casework analysis.
    Wallin JM; Buoncristiani MR; Lazaruk KD; Fildes N; Holt CL; Walsh PS
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):854-70. PubMed ID: 9670511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing whether stutter and low-level DNA peaks are additive.
    Buckleton JS; Lohmueller KE; Inman K; Cheng K; Curran JM; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102166. PubMed ID: 31586815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.