BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26219310)

  • 1. Test-retest reliability and task order effects of emotional cognitive tests in healthy subjects.
    Adams T; Pounder Z; Preston S; Hanson A; Gallagher P; Harmer CJ; McAllister-Williams RH
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Nov; 30(7):1247-59. PubMed ID: 26219310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of gender, age, schooling, and cultural background on the identification of facial emotions: a transcultural study.
    de Souza LC; Bertoux M; de Faria ÂRV; Corgosinho LTS; Prado ACA; Barbosa IG; Caramelli P; Colosimo E; Teixeira AL
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1861-1870. PubMed ID: 29798733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability and effects of repeated testing and satiety on performance of an Emotional Test Battery.
    Thomas JM; Higgs S; Dourish CT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(4):416-33. PubMed ID: 26702993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the NMDA receptor partial agonist, d-cycloserine, on emotional processing and autobiographical memory.
    Chen R; Capitão LP; Cowen PJ; Harmer CJ
    Psychol Med; 2021 Nov; 51(15):2657-2665. PubMed ID: 32375905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-Retest Reliability of Frontal and Parietal Alpha Asymmetry during Presentation of Emotional Face Stimuli in Healthy Subjects.
    Koller-Schlaud K; Querbach J; Behr J; Ströhle A; Rentzsch J
    Neuropsychobiology; 2020; 79(6):428-436. PubMed ID: 32182618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive-emotive fMRI test battery.
    Plichta MM; Schwarz AJ; Grimm O; Morgen K; Mier D; Haddad L; Gerdes AB; Sauer C; Tost H; Esslinger C; Colman P; Wilson F; Kirsch P; Meyer-Lindenberg A
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1746-58. PubMed ID: 22330316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial Emotion Recognition and Expression in Parkinson's Disease: An Emotional Mirror Mechanism?
    Ricciardi L; Visco-Comandini F; Erro R; Morgante F; Bologna M; Fasano A; Ricciardi D; Edwards MJ; Kilner J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169110. PubMed ID: 28068393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures.
    Evans TC; Walukevich KA; Seager I; Britton JC
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2018 Sep; 31(5):539-554. PubMed ID: 29976098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People with chronic facial pain perform worse than controls at a facial emotion recognition task, but it is not all about the emotion.
    von Piekartz H; Wallwork SB; Mohr G; Butler DS; Moseley GL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 42(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 25483874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal unpredictability of a stimulus sequence and the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli.
    Koppe G; Heidel A; Sammer G; Bohus M; Gallhofer B; Kirsch P; Lis S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():214-24. PubMed ID: 26143208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reduced emotional reactivity to negative stimuli in multiple sclerosis, preliminary results].
    Di Bitonto L; Longato N; Jung B; Fleury M; Marcel C; Collongues N; de Seze J; Blanc F
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2011 Nov; 167(11):820-6. PubMed ID: 21906769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of the emotional stroop task: examining the paradox of measurement change.
    Eide P; Kemp A; Silberstein RB; Nathan PJ; Stough C
    J Psychol; 2002 Sep; 136(5):514-20. PubMed ID: 12431035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of an emotion maintenance task.
    Broome R; Gard DE; Mikels JA
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(4):737-47. PubMed ID: 22077723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The functional correlates of face perception and recognition of emotional facial expressions as evidenced by fMRI.
    Jehna M; Neuper C; Ischebeck A; Loitfelder M; Ropele S; Langkammer C; Ebner F; Fuchs S; Schmidt R; Fazekas F; Enzinger C
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1393():73-83. PubMed ID: 21513918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder.
    Dyck M; Habel U; Slodczyk J; Schlummer J; Backes V; Schneider F; Reske M
    Psychol Med; 2009 May; 39(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 18752730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.
    Rohr M; Tröger J; Michely N; Uhde A; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 28213830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good test--retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities.
    Hughes C; Adlam A; Happé F; Jackson J; Taylor A; Caspi A
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2000 May; 41(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 10836678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor emotional responsiveness in clinical hypertension: Reduced accuracy in the labelling and matching of emotional faces amongst individuals with hypertension and prehypertension.
    Shukla M; Pandey R; Jain D; Lau JYF
    Psychol Health; 2018 Jun; 33(6):765-782. PubMed ID: 29129111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos.
    Wingenbach TSH; Ashwin C; Brosnan M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190634. PubMed ID: 29293674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.