566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26219401)
1. Assessing the global zoo response to the amphibian crisis through 20-year trends in captive collections.
Dawson J; Patel F; Griffiths RA; Young RP
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 26219401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developments in amphibian captive breeding and reintroduction programs.
Harding G; Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):340-9. PubMed ID: 26306460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zoos through the lens of the IUCN Red List: a global metapopulation approach to support conservation breeding programs.
Conde DA; Colchero F; Gusset M; Pearce-Kelly P; Byers O; Flesness N; Browne RK; Jones OR
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80311. PubMed ID: 24348999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited contributions of released animals from zoos to North American conservation translocations.
Brichieri-Colombi TA; Lloyd NA; McPherson JM; Moehrenschlager A
Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29923231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guiding the prioritization of the most endangered and evolutionary distinct birds for new zoo conservation programs.
Biega AM; Lamont M; Mooers A; Bowkett AE; Martin TE
Zoo Biol; 2019 May; 38(3):305-315. PubMed ID: 30868683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limits to captive breeding of mammals in zoos.
Alroy J
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):926-31. PubMed ID: 25736919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zoos and amphibian conservation: Evaluating the impact of "The Year of The Frog" Campaign.
Dos Santos MM; Griffiths RA; Jowett T; Bishop PJ
Zoo Biol; 2022 May; 41(3):226-233. PubMed ID: 34951730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximizing the potential for living cell banks to contribute to global conservation priorities.
Mooney A; Ryder OA; Houck ML; Staerk J; Conde DA; Buckley YM
Zoo Biol; 2023; 42(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 37283210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated Collection Assessment and Planning (ICAP) workshop: Helping zoos move toward the One Plan Approach.
Traylor-Holzer K; Leus K; Bauman K
Zoo Biol; 2019 Jan; 38(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 30672035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zoo animals as "proxy species" for threatened sister taxa: Defining a novel form of species surrogacy.
Kerr KCR
Zoo Biol; 2021 Jan; 40(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 33043534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of Brazilian zoos in ex situ bird conservation: from 1981 to 2005.
Azevedo CS; Young RJ; Rodrigues M
Zoo Biol; 2011; 30(6):655-71. PubMed ID: 22147594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Contribution of North American Zoos and Aquariums to Endangered Species Recovery.
Che-Castaldo JP; Grow SA; Faust LJ
Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):9789. PubMed ID: 29955071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians.
Griffiths RA; Pavajeau L
Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):852-61. PubMed ID: 18616746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotyping on the ark: A synthesis of genetic resources available for species in zoos.
Jensen EL; McClenaghan B; Ford B; Lentini A; Kerr KCR; Russello MA
Zoo Biol; 2020 Jul; 39(4):257-262. PubMed ID: 32196733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Global gap analysis of cactus species and priority sites for their conservation.
Goettsch B; Durán AP; Gaston KJ
Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 30039592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Role of Reproductive Technologies in Amphibian Conservation Breeding Programs.
Silla AJ; Byrne PG
Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2019 Feb; 7():499-519. PubMed ID: 30359086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of understanding of the amphibian crisis by zoo visitors across three countries.
Dos Santos MM; Griffiths RA; Jowett T; Rock J; Bishop PJ
Zoo Biol; 2019 Dec; 38(6):471-480. PubMed ID: 31602677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species.
Wood J; Ballou JD; Callicrate T; Fant JB; Griffith MP; Kramer AT; Lacy RC; Meyer A; Sullivan S; Traylor-Holzer K; Walsh SK; Havens K
Conserv Biol; 2020 Dec; 34(6):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 32233087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation.
Bowkett AE
Conserv Biol; 2009 Jun; 23(3):773-6. PubMed ID: 19220367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA barcoding applied to ex situ tropical amphibian conservation programme reveals cryptic diversity in captive populations.
Crawford AJ; Cruz C; Griffith E; Ross H; Ibáñez R; Lips KR; Driskell AC; Bermingham E; Crump P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 Nov; 13(6):1005-18. PubMed ID: 23280343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
