BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26219924)

  • 1. Canaries in the coal mine: Personal and professional impact of undergoing whole genome sequencing on medical professionals.
    Zierhut H; McCarthy Veach P; LeRoy B
    Am J Med Genet A; 2015 Nov; 167A(11):2647-56. PubMed ID: 26219924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
    Zoltick ES; Linderman MD; McGinniss MA; Ramos E; Ball MP; Church GM; Leonard DGB; Pereira S; McGuire AL; Caskey CT; Sanderson SC; Schadt EE; Nielsen DE; Crawford SD; Green RC;
    Genome Med; 2019 Feb; 11(1):10. PubMed ID: 30808425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
    Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Diaz GA; Zinberg RE; Ferryman K; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26036856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.
    Suckiel SA; Linderman MD; Sanderson SC; Diaz GA; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE; Zinberg RE
    J Genet Couns; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1044-53. PubMed ID: 26898680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Because I want to be informed, to be part of the decision-making": Patients' insights on informed consent practices by healthcare professionals in South Africa.
    Chima SC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 18 Suppl():S46-56. PubMed ID: 26620622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
    Levenseller BL; Soucier DJ; Miller VA; Harris D; Conway L; Bernhardt BA
    J Genet Couns; 2014 Aug; 23(4):552-65. PubMed ID: 23846343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.
    Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Suckiel SA; Zinberg R; Wasserstein M; Kasarskis A; Diaz GA; Schadt EE
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(3):280-292. PubMed ID: 28051073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.
    Robinson JO; Carroll TM; Feuerman LZ; Perry DL; Hoffman-Andrews L; Walsh RC; Christensen KD; Green RC; McGuire AL;
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 26928896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Next-generation sequencing in precision oncology: Patient understanding and expectations.
    Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Le LQ; Bartnik NJ; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Chinnaiyan AM;
    Cancer Med; 2019 Jan; 8(1):227-237. PubMed ID: 30600607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
    Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opening the "black box" of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study.
    Sanderson SC; Lewis C; Patch C; Hill M; Bitner-Glindzicz M; Chitty LS
    Genet Med; 2019 May; 21(5):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 30270361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the outcomes of volunteering for education: development and pilot of a tool to assess healthcare professionals' personal and professional development from international volunteering.
    Tyler N; Collares C; Byrne G; Byrne-Davis L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e028206. PubMed ID: 31320351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal genomic screening: How best to facilitate preparedness of future clients.
    Fleming J; Terrill B; Dziadek M; Kirk EP; Roscioli T; Barlow-Stewart K
    Eur J Med Genet; 2019 May; 62(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 31085343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of incorporating personal genome sequencing into graduate genomics education: a longitudinal study over three course years.
    Linderman MD; Sanderson SC; Bashir A; Diaz GA; Kasarskis A; Zinberg R; Mahajan M; Suckiel SA; Zweig M; Schadt EE
    BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Jan; 11(1):5. PubMed ID: 29382336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulating the Genetics Clinic of the Future - whether undergoing whole-genome sequencing shapes professional attitudes.
    Brunfeldt M; Teare H; Schuurbiers D; Steinberger D; Gerrits E; Vornanen M; Knoers N; Kääriäinen H; Vrijenhoek T
    J Community Genet; 2022 Apr; 13(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 35084702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled study of a consent intervention for participating in an NIH genome sequencing study.
    Turbitt E; Chrysostomou PP; Peay HL; Heidlebaugh AR; Nelson LM; Biesecker BB
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 May; 26(5):622-630. PubMed ID: 29453419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project.
    Roberts JS; Robinson JO; Diamond PM; Bharadwaj A; Christensen KD; Lee KB; Green RC; McGuire AL;
    Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 29300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing NCGENES research participants' requests for non-medically actionable secondary findings.
    Roche MI; Griesemer I; Khan CM; Moore E; Lin FC; O'Daniel JM; Foreman AKM; Lee K; Powell BC; Berg JS; Evans JP; Henderson GE; Rini C
    Genet Med; 2019 May; 21(5):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 30237575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward greater understanding of patient decision-making around genome sequencing.
    Hull LE; Vassy JL
    Per Med; 2018 Jan; 15(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 29714114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
    Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.