98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26219924)
21. Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study.
Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Kasarskis A; Bashir A; Diaz GA; Mahajan MC; Shah H; Wasserstein M; Zinberg RE; Zweig M; Schadt EE
Genome Med; 2013; 5(12):113. PubMed ID: 24373383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Motivations to learn genomic information are not exceptional: Lessons from behavioral science.
Taber JM; Peters E; Klein WMP; Cameron LD; Turbitt E; Biesecker BB
Clin Genet; 2023 Oct; 104(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 37491896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.
O'Daniel JM; Haga SB; Willard HF
J Genet Couns; 2010 Aug; 19(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 20352309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Facio FM; Eidem H; Fisher T; Brooks S; Linn A; Kaphingst KA; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Mar; 21(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22892536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.
Steinert Y; Naismith L; Mann K
Med Teach; 2012; 34(6):483-503. PubMed ID: 22578043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.
Niemiec E; Borry P; Pinxten W; Howard HC
Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 27647801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cancer patients' views and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative study.
Bartley N; Best M; Jacobs C; Juraskova I; Newson AJ; Savard J; Meiser B; Ballinger ML; Thomas DM; Biesecker B; Butow P
J Med Genet; 2020 Oct; 57(10):671-676. PubMed ID: 31980566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings.
Strong KA; Zusevics KL; Bick D; Veith R
Clin Genet; 2014 Nov; 86(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 24673592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
Tomlinson AN; Skinner D; Perry DL; Scollon SR; Roche MI; Bernhardt BA
J Genet Couns; 2016 Feb; 25(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 25911622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.
Yip S; Fleming J; Shepherd HL; Walczak A; Clark J; Butow P
Oncologist; 2019 Jun; 24(6):844-856. PubMed ID: 30413662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Lewis KL; Hooker GW; Connors PD; Hyams TC; Wright MF; Caldwell S; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB
Genet Med; 2016 Jun; 18(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 26540156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Informed consent in direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the outline of a model between specific and generic consent.
Bunnik EM; Janssens AC; Schermer MH
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):343-51. PubMed ID: 23137034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Capacity and consent: Knowledge and practice of legal and healthcare standards.
Lamont S; Stewart C; Chiarella M
Nurs Ethics; 2019 Feb; 26(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 28093938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis.
Christensen KD; Vassy JL; Jamal L; Lehmann LS; Slashinski MJ; Perry DL; Robinson JO; Blumenthal-Barby J; Feuerman LZ; Murray MF; Green RC; McGuire AL;
Clin Genet; 2016 Feb; 89(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 26080898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How do students react to analyzing their own genomes in a whole-genome sequencing course?: outcomes of a longitudinal cohort study.
Sanderson SC; Linderman MD; Zinberg R; Bashir A; Kasarskis A; Zweig M; Suckiel S; Shah H; Mahajan M; Diaz GA; Schadt EE
Genet Med; 2015 Nov; 17(11):866-74. PubMed ID: 25634025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.
Lewis KL; Han PK; Hooker GW; Klein WM; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132690. PubMed ID: 26186621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Ethical dilemmas in a general practitioner's clinic due to incidental findings resulting from whole genome sequencing].
Wouters RHP; Bijlsma RM; Voest EE; Bredenoord AL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2018 Jun; 162():. PubMed ID: 31035742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
