192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220124)
21. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT colonography: methods, pathology and pitfalls.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI
Clin Radiol; 2003 Mar; 58(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 12639524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Polyp detection at CT colonography: inadequate primary 3D endoluminal reference standard precludes meaningful comparison.
Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):316-7. PubMed ID: 17581913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hybrid segmentation of colon filled with air and opacified fluid for CT colonography.
Franaszek M; Summers RM; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 16524091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [CT colonography: pathologic findings and pitfalls].
Mang T; Graser A; Maier A; Mueller-Mang C; Böhm G; Schima W
Radiologe; 2008 Feb; 48(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 18210056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi.
Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Lorenz M; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix RR
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 15855065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measurement of smaller colon polyp in CT colonography images using morphological image processing.
Manjunath KN; Siddalingaswamy PC; Prabhu GK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1845-1855. PubMed ID: 28573348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation.
Pickhardt PJ; Choi JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 12933484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps.
Yoshida H; Näppi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1261-74. PubMed ID: 11811826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A straightforward approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric feature in CT colonography.
Lee JG; Hyo Kim J; Hyung Kim S; Sun Park H; Ihn Choi B
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):790-801. PubMed ID: 21762887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography.
Röttgen R; Fischbach F; Plotkin M; Herzog H; Freund T; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Acta Radiol; 2005 May; 46(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 15981716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo- and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly).
Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Lange N; Lui YW
Radiographics; 2003; 23(5):1073-91. PubMed ID: 12975501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy).
Pickhardt PJ
Radiographics; 2004; 24(6):1535-56; discussion 1557-9. PubMed ID: 15537963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A fully automatic CAD-CTC system based on curvature analysis for standard and low-dose CT data.
Chowdhury TA; Whelan PF; Ghita O
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):888-901. PubMed ID: 18334380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detectability of small and flat polyps in MDCT colonography using 2D and 3D imaging tools: results from a phantom study.
Mang TG; Schaefer-Prokop C; Maier A; Schober E; Lechner G; Prokop M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 16304017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Virtual colonoscopy: clinical results.
Macari M
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2001 Oct; 22(5):432-42. PubMed ID: 11665922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
